Dodge Dodge Forum Ram SRT-10
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

SRT4 VS COBALT SS

  Printable Version
Dodge Forums >> General >> Brand News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion >> SRT4 VS COBALT SS Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/2/2006 11:38:43 PM   
wpgdakota

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 2/3/2004
From: Canada
Status: offline
The Winnipeg Free Press is moding a cobalt SS...they dyno'd it before doing anything and got 262hp from it? anyone dyno a srt4 lately???
Post #: 1
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/3/2006 12:04:06 AM   
clean_sx


Posts: 1764
Joined: 12/16/2005
From: Canada
Status: offline
clean_sx's photo gallery
i saw that too. I have to call BS on this. simply b/c the cobalt SS is a 2.0L. And i hear the SRT4 gets somewheres of 250Hp as a stage 1.

_____________________________

Duncan

2005 SX 2.0 Sport
Chrome, Sunroof, 5 spd
In Search of Neon SRT-4 for decent price

(in reply to wpgdakota)
Post #: 2
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/3/2006 6:05:48 AM   
HemiMan4451


Posts: 2624
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Uh, thats complete and utter BS. A stock Cobalt SS S/C makes 205hp at the flywheel, how is it going to make 262 at the wheels?

And if it makes 262hp at the wheels stock (which it doesnt), the SRT-4 must make 310hp

_____________________________



04'' Ram 1500 5.7L RCLB
-Flowmaster 40 series dual exhaust

(in reply to wpgdakota)
Post #: 3
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/3/2006 3:51:55 PM   
shiltz


Posts: 549
Joined: 3/17/2004
Status: offline
The same way a stock SRT-4 dyno's at the wheels higher than it's rated HP at the flywheel, i've heard of stock SRT-4's dynoing at 250+ at the wheels, because they were underated from the manufacturer. The size of the engine doesn't really mean much, a honda S2000 makes 240hp with a N/A 2.0L, and a mitsubishi lancer evo makes 286hp with a 2.0 turbo.

Given that i've seen stock cobalt SS S/C run 1/4 mile times right around where a stock SRT-4 would and acording to chevy's specs it weighs more than an SRT-4 does those numbers seem belivable to me.

(in reply to HemiMan4451)
Post #: 4
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/4/2006 12:16:34 AM   
clean_sx


Posts: 1764
Joined: 12/16/2005
From: Canada
Status: offline
clean_sx's photo gallery
"262HP" Cobalt

_____________________________

Duncan

2005 SX 2.0 Sport
Chrome, Sunroof, 5 spd
In Search of Neon SRT-4 for decent price

(in reply to wpgdakota)
Post #: 5
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/4/2006 1:07:09 PM   
HemiMan4451


Posts: 2624
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Maryland
Status: offline
Thats complete BS, a Cobalt SS cant come close to SRT-4 times, and theyre saying it makes 262hp at the wheels?

_____________________________



04'' Ram 1500 5.7L RCLB
-Flowmaster 40 series dual exhaust

(in reply to wpgdakota)
Post #: 6
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/4/2006 2:35:10 PM   
shiltz


Posts: 549
Joined: 3/17/2004
Status: offline
Well the shootout Motor Trend did shows otherwise. They showed both to have almost the same performance under the same conditions.

SRT-4
0-60: 6.0 sec
1/4 mile: 14.4 @ 100.8mph

Cobalt SS
0-60: 6.1 sec
1/4 mile: 14.4 @ 99.3mph

(in reply to HemiMan4451)
Post #: 7
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/4/2006 10:17:27 PM   
wpgdakota

 

Posts: 59
Joined: 2/3/2004
From: Canada
Status: offline
262 was flywheel much less at the wheels...SRT would be higher im sure

(in reply to shiltz)
Post #: 8
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/5/2006 12:00:11 AM   
Dakota_24


Posts: 1209
Joined: 12/24/2005
Status: offline
I actually got to rent a cobalt ss and it is a quick lil car; I wouldnt mind having one. But that doesnt mean that if I had a chance to buy a SRT-4 and a Cobalt ss ; I would definetly choose the srt-4 because Im DODGE THROUGH AND THROUGH!

(in reply to wpgdakota)
Post #: 9
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/5/2006 9:14:11 AM   
DevilsReject



Toys For Tots Fund Contributor
Posts: 7993
Joined: 7/29/2005
From: Indianapolis, Indiana a.k.a Hell
Status: offline
For starters, the article is accurate. The Cobalt SS Supercharged is actually almost spot on with the SRT-4 in terms of speeds/power stock vs. stock. It's crap on a road course, and would get its butt handed to it by an SRT-4. That being said, in terms of the 1/4 mile....for price....the Cobalt SS/C is actually the closest stock competitor to the SRT-4.

Read the article.....

quote:

At the factory-stated horsepower peak of 5,600 rpm, all three passes came in at or very close to an engine flywheel output of 235 horsepower, 30 more than stated by GM. Horsepower at the wheels ranged between 187 to 194. In third gear, the 6,450 rpm peak returned a peak horsepower output of 262.1 for the engine and 213.8 at the wheels. Maximum speed peak for third gear was about 160 km/h. In fourth gear, the rpm limit returned 245.8 horses for the mill, and 197.7 at the wheels.


The rev limiter kicks in at that point...meaning its above warrantied specs and is basically red-lining the motor so to be speak...the numbers are completely possible. The SRT-4 put out numbers JUST like this.....so why would you believe it cant be done? Stop thinking the SRT-4 is the only car capable of it. It's NOT. The Honda S2000 puts out 240hp N/A.....in a 2.0L motor.....are they b.sing too? I think not.


Something else I want you to think about...is that the Cobalt SS/C actually only weighs about 50lbs less then the SRT-4....despite being a 2dr coupe. These cars could provide good competition for the SRT-4....in both the Neon and in the Caliber. The biggest difference is that Chevy simply wont match Dodge in performance. They have no profit in it.....and quite frankly....they dont have to....as Dodge has once again shot itself in the foot over not providing a niche car like the Cobalt/Scion tC/Civic/Accord/Solara etc etc....basically a 2dr coupe that is under 25k...

Edit: Just one additional add....not every car dyno's the exact same number or runs the exact same 1/4 mile time. Some run a bit faster...some run a bit slower..

< Message edited by DevilsReject -- 6/5/2006 9:21:32 AM >


_____________________________


(in reply to Dakota_24)
Post #: 10
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/5/2006 2:34:51 PM   
HemiMan4451


Posts: 2624
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Maryland
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: shiltz

Well the shootout Motor Trend did shows otherwise. They showed both to have almost the same performance under the same conditions.

SRT-4
0-60: 6.0 sec
1/4 mile: 14.4 @ 100.8mph

Cobalt SS
0-60: 6.1 sec
1/4 mile: 14.4 @ 99.3mph

Tell that to the SRT-4 guys who get 13's stock.

_____________________________



04'' Ram 1500 5.7L RCLB
-Flowmaster 40 series dual exhaust

(in reply to shiltz)
Post #: 11
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/5/2006 2:58:22 PM   
DevilsReject



Toys For Tots Fund Contributor
Posts: 7993
Joined: 7/29/2005
From: Indianapolis, Indiana a.k.a Hell
Status: offline
The stock times for a SRT-4 are between 13.9-14.1......and the stock times for the Cobalt SS/C is like 14.2-14.4....

Truth of the matter is....not everyone gets 13.9.....there are guys who are running 14.5.....just because you have a fast car doesnt mean you can DRIVE IT that fast.....you have to realize....the reaction time of one person is always different then another....other factors added in are sea level, wind resistance, weather, etc...

_____________________________


(in reply to HemiMan4451)
Post #: 12
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/5/2006 3:18:32 PM   
shiltz


Posts: 549
Joined: 3/17/2004
Status: offline
Yeah, not everyone and every car can get 13's stock, the same model car can differ in performance, both by the car and the conditions (and with manuals by the driver as well), i've seens numbers on stock Magnum R/T's from 13.9 to 15.1, stock cobalts can get into the high 13's as well. The Cobalt SS S/C vs SRT-4 is a good comparison because both were with the same driver and conditions so that eliminates two of the three variables.

(in reply to DevilsReject)
Post #: 13
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/5/2006 8:23:44 PM   
97 3.5 Intrepid

 

Posts: 1397
Joined: 9/30/2005
Status: offline
The fastest I have ever read for the SRT-4 is around 5.4 0-60. The fastest I have ever seen for the Cobalt is 6.0. The SRT-4 is faster.

_____________________________

College Graduate
B.S. in Marketing

(in reply to wpgdakota)
Post #: 14
RE: SRT4 VS COBALT SS - 6/6/2006 6:41:26 AM   
DevilsReject



Toys For Tots Fund Contributor
Posts: 7993
Joined: 7/29/2005
From: Indianapolis, Indiana a.k.a Hell
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: 97 3.5 Intrepid

The fastest I have ever read for the SRT-4 is around 5.4 0-60. The fastest I have ever seen for the Cobalt is 6.0. The SRT-4 is faster.


I dont ever think that was an issue. The SRT-4 has more HP, more Torque, and a better gearing.

_____________________________


(in reply to 97 3.5 Intrepid)
Post #: 15
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
 
Dodge Forums >> General >> Brand News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21161
badstratrt20848
midnight17863
vipergts14501
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912450
steve05ram3611410
nickoman0110864
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.