updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long)
Login | |
|
updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 4/19/2006 11:44:04 AM
|
|
|
HankL
Posts: 2719
Joined: 8/20/2005 Status: offline
|
Removed May of 2008 as hits per month fell to zero. Enjoy your truck and enjoy increasing your knowledge of it. So long.
< Message edited by HankL -- 5/22/2008 4:09:23 AM >
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 7/24/2006 12:43:46 PM
|
|
|
HankL
Posts: 2719
Joined: 8/20/2005 Status: offline
|
obsolete post
< Message edited by HankL -- 5/22/2008 4:10:19 AM >
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 11/16/2006 6:19:11 AM
|
|
|
HankL
Posts: 2719
Joined: 8/20/2005 Status: offline
|
btt
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 11/17/2006 7:33:03 PM
|
|
|
steve05ram360
 Posts: 11410
Joined: 1/22/2004 From: Elk Grove, CA Status: offline
|
this should help hank... (pin it to the top)
_____________________________
http://www.dodgeforum.com/m_1037052/tm.htm http://s41.photobucket.com/albums/e266/sdoherma/
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 1/4/2007 9:44:37 PM
|
|
|
archer000001
Posts: 1
Joined: 12/23/2006 Status: offline
|
Hank -- Where did you find 5-bolt rims to mount the 235/85Rx16 tires? Usually they are mounted on 16x6.5 or 16x7.0 rims with 8 bolts. I'd like to try this if I can find the right rims. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 8/3/2007 4:55:13 AM
|
|
|
bbt
Posts: 2
Joined: 8/3/2007 Status: offline
|
i need to replace a v10 engine in a 97 dodge ram 3500 dually 4x4. any ideas which engines will fit or where i can find a place that has a list or a way to figure this out. also, i know the wiring harness will need to be changed but also need ideas / sources on that. also have anny of you done this and if so what was your cost. i think it will be worth it but just need to sort out the details. thanks
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 9/7/2007 9:35:57 PM
|
|
|
Caisson06
Posts: 11
Joined: 9/7/2007 Status: offline
|
Whether it got me better fuel economy is debatable, but my old gasser, I put Gibson Headers (designed for towing, not racing, they say) on my 318, and it definitely helped getting up the hills. Before, the truck would downshift on the long grades, sometimes 3-4 times. After, it only downshifted once on the longest grade. Dont' overkill on the exhaust. I put the performance cat and dual Gibson exhaust on later, and lost about 1/2 of my gain from the headers.
_____________________________
2005 CTD 2500 QC SB G56 answers to "beast." ------------------------ "I do what the Smarty tells me to do."
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 9/13/2007 5:15:14 AM
|
|
|
HankL
Posts: 2719
Joined: 8/20/2005 Status: offline
|
Making mods to improve fuel economy on your pickup then investing the savings in the stock of refinery companies (Valero, etc) is one way to get two bites of the apple. Finding ways to raise the cylinder compression ratio, lower the body aero drag, and improve the rolling resistance of the tires are especially interesting... because they improve both acceleration and fuel economy at the same time. It is sad to see suckers throw away $300 million or more each year on cold air intakes when that money could have been spent on real improvements.
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 9/13/2007 5:43:36 AM
|
|
|
steve05ram360
 Posts: 11410
Joined: 1/22/2004 From: Elk Grove, CA Status: offline
|
CAI's work if they are setup properly.
_____________________________
http://www.dodgeforum.com/m_1037052/tm.htm http://s41.photobucket.com/albums/e266/sdoherma/
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 9/17/2007 8:56:07 AM
|
|
|
Caisson06
Posts: 11
Joined: 9/7/2007 Status: offline
|
It just depends on the truck. I simply installed a K&N stock type (donut style) filter in my 92 Dakota 3.9 L V6 2WD and saw an instant 3 MPG increase. Put a Gen II FIPK on my 99 Ram 4x4, no noticeable difference. Put a set of Gibson Headers, Hi Flow Cat and a Dual Exhaust, still no change. Just pushing too much air compared to the Dakota 2WD. I'm not putting that type of filter on my $5000 Cummins. It's got an Amsoil Ea nanofiber filter in the stock airbox. Stock airboxes on 2003 and later are good enough. Only things needed are to replace the tube from the box in with a smooth tube, vice the accordion pipe. I'm currently testing a blocked off grille. I taped up my 05's grille with black duct tape, and it actually looks pretty decent. I'm running empty, so it's not going to overheat.
< Message edited by Caisson06 -- 9/17/2007 9:02:38 AM >
_____________________________
2005 CTD 2500 QC SB G56 answers to "beast." ------------------------ "I do what the Smarty tells me to do."
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 9/17/2007 9:20:30 AM
|
|
|
steve05ram360
 Posts: 11410
Joined: 1/22/2004 From: Elk Grove, CA Status: offline
|
I saw similar results on my '00 ram 4x4 QC with the same mods you mentioned... I did however tweek the exhaust some and brought back some lost mpg with the exhaust change. I eventually went from consistant mid 12's to the upper 13's. I peaked at 15.8 mpg on a long trip.... man I was so excited, you'da thought I won the lottery.
_____________________________
http://www.dodgeforum.com/m_1037052/tm.htm http://s41.photobucket.com/albums/e266/sdoherma/
|
|
|
|
RE: updated FAQ on Ram MPG improvement (long) - 9/18/2007 4:20:43 AM
|
|
|
HankL
Posts: 2719
Joined: 8/20/2005 Status: offline
|
Some people thought it was a joke, but in the past here on Dodgeforum I have offered to put up $30,000 in the hands of a third party against anyone who would also put up $30,000 cash with a 3rd party as a bet that a CAI would not change MPG in a careful test run by a third party. I was serious and would still do this. The IRS would not consider this a 'gamble' but a game of skill. The best test for MPG that anyone has devised so far is the SAE/TMC Type IV test that can measure down to a 2% difference. The $30,000 bet would be that tests of two vehicles would show less than a 2% difference when a CAI was first fitted to one vehicle then a 2nd identical test run when the CAI was swapped to the other vehicle. Good companies are now using the SAE/TMC mpg test to 'prove' that their product works: ---- The right way to do it Goodyear goes by the book with Fuel Max test When Goodyear introduced its new Unisteel tires with Fuel Max technology last year, and claimed that they were more fuel-efficient than its older designs, the company invited the press to come to its San Angelo Proving Grounds in Texas and observe an SAE/TMC Type II fuel consumption test, pitting old against new. In this case, two identical tractor-trailers — a control rig and a test rig with the same powertrain, mileage, horsepower, GCW, tires, pressure, etc. — were fitted with removable, portable fuel tanks, which were weighed before and after identical runs of at least 28 miles at the exact same highway speed. Fuel consumption was measured by tank weight, and the two rigs were compared as a baseline. Three runs, which must produce results within 2 percent of each other, were made. In this case, the two rigs’ fuel consumption figures were consistently within 1 percent of each other. Next, the test was repeated, with the control rig unchanged, and the test truck fitted with the component to be tested — in this case, the new tires. Over the course of three runs, with results within 2 percent of each other, the test truck had consumed about 7.5 percent less fuel per run. Claim made, point proved, case closed. ------ also Lubrizol, the maker of Chrysler ATF+4 does similar tests: http://web.archive.org/web/20051105055119/http://www.lubrizol.com/DieselTrends/Trends9/new_lubes.asp and Walmart would not buy these aero devices for its fleet of trucks until a SAE/TMC mpg test was completed: http://www.freightwing.com/sae%20results.htm So if you believe that CAI's improve MPG why don't collect this 'easy' $30,000 ? But to keep down hard feelings ya ought to try the test in advance a few times to make sure you are not throwing your money away because some might say I am 'trolling for suckers' too. Why don't you see KN, Airaid, Volant, etc have in their ads that they have done a SAE/TMC Type IV test and proved that their product improves mpg like Goodyear did?
|
|
|
|
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
Make A Donation
Forum Rules & FAQ
RSS Feeds
SRT Forums
Race News
Dodge Prices
Dodge Trucks & SUVs
Ram Dakota
Durango Nitro
Dodge Cars
Avenger Intrepid
Caliber Magnum
Challenger Neon
Charger Stealth
Daytona Stratus
Dodge Viper
Advertising Info
|
Contact Us |
Link To Us |
Sitemap |
Archive |
Advertising |
Automotive Directory |
About Us |
Dodge Links |
Legal |
Privacy Policy |
© Dodge Forum
Harley Davidson |
Ford Mustang Forums |
Dodge Challenger
Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.
|