Dodge Dodge Forum SRT
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram

  Printable Version
Dodge Forums >> Dodge Trucks >> Dodge Dakota >> 2nd Gen Dakota >> 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/2/2006 10:07:10 PM   
Zonda

 

Posts: 8
Joined: 1/23/2006
Status: offline
i was just wondering which one is faster the 5.7 hemi or the mag 5.9
thanks
Post #: 1
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/2/2006 10:19:53 PM   
Daksport1pa


Posts: 2845
Joined: 6/30/2005
Status: offline
Daksport1pa's photo gallery
I believe the 5.7 hemi is faster. I know people who have run 4.7s against 5.9s and have beat them. Not to say that they're slow because they're not. The motors technology is just different.

(in reply to Zonda)
Post #: 2
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/3/2006 2:14:59 AM   
horatio102


Posts: 2233
Joined: 2/2/2005
Status: offline
My money would be on a hemi ram, unless you're talking about a highway geared quad cab 3500. All things being equal though, the 5.9 isn't that quick. It's a torque motor, a real truck engine, and generates its power down low, whereas the 4.7 and 5.7 generate more of their power up top.


_____________________________

99 WJ Laredo v8 4x4

91 Mustang GT Roadster

90 Miata

05 Legacy GT Limited wagon

(in reply to Daksport1pa)
Post #: 3
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/3/2006 9:12:44 AM   
Radman

 

Posts: 69
Joined: 1/10/2006
Status: offline
I'd love to see a Dakota R/T 5.9 drag race a Full size Ram Hemi!

I think I'd put my money on the Dakota only because of the
difference in weight.

(in reply to Zonda)
Post #: 4
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/3/2006 9:35:56 AM   
BigE


Posts: 288
Joined: 12/13/2005
Status: offline
It is all about weight. My old 2003 Dakota R/T std cab was only 4200lbs. How heavy is the lightest 2wd ram 1500 w/ a 5.7L? Got to be over 5000 lbs. It would have to be a 2wd, 5.7L manual, standard cab with a short bed. The best ¼ mile time I could get out of my bone stock 5.9 R/T was 15.08 @ 89 mph. I had a lot of Hemi ram owners try and race me all the time, but they all lost. All were 4wd or 4 door Ram trucks. I never raced the light ones. They were allways very pissed off when I beat them. One time this guy could not stop talking about how his truck was going to walk all over mine. We raced from two stop lights. I pulled a car length on him out of the hole both times. We raced again from a 30 mph roll, put a car length on him again by 60 mph. After that he just kept yelling with his head out the window that his truck would walk away from me on the freeway. I said no way was that heavy truck going to beat me. So I told him to lead the way to the freeway so I could follow him and shut him up, but he turned off the road to go home. He was driving a 2wd 5.7L ram with 4 doors and a short bed.

What is the best ¼ mile time someone has got out of their 2wd, 5.7L regular cab, short bed, manual 1500 Ram? I kinda want to know.

_____________________________

-Big E
'05 Black SRT-4 Stage 2, Mopar exhaust, BOV,
NGK Plugs, MSD Wires, K&N filter & $20 OCC
Dunlop SP Winter Sport 3D -Now Equipped
To Cruise; Drive around with out a destination.
To Farm; Drive around with out a destination looking for a

(in reply to Radman)
Post #: 5
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/3/2006 12:12:19 PM   
horatio102


Posts: 2233
Joined: 2/2/2005
Status: offline
Apparently we should clarify, are we talking about an R/T 2wd Dak or a quad cab 4x4 Dak, or what? I believe my QC is actually heavier than my Ram.

_____________________________

99 WJ Laredo v8 4x4

91 Mustang GT Roadster

90 Miata

05 Legacy GT Limited wagon

(in reply to BigE)
Post #: 6
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/3/2006 8:35:54 PM   
LAKOTA169


Posts: 652
Joined: 9/9/2005
Status: offline
LAKOTA169's photo gallery
I had a 1999Dak R/T CC and I have a Magnum R/T. My wife still has her 2000 Dak R/T CC. The Magnum is faster. Haven't raced my wife. Not going to (I'm not that stupid). "Dear, remember what you didn't get last night? Well, your not getting it tonight either."

< Message edited by LAKOTA169 -- 2/3/2006 8:36:38 PM >


_____________________________

'05 Hemi Magnum (His)
'00 Dakota R/T (Hers)
'37 Plymouth Business Coupe (Ours)

http://s26.photobucket.com/albums/c141/LAKOTA169/Car%20Images/?start=all

I carry a gun, because a cop is too heavy to carry.

(in reply to horatio102)
Post #: 7
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/4/2006 6:32:14 PM   
Dakota736

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 2/4/2006
Status: offline
Well i have seen them race before and the Dakota R/T won. The Dakota had a aftermarket exhaust on it but that was it. If you look it up the R/T has a 0-60 in 6.8 seconds and the Ram does it in 7.0 and the faster you go the farther the ram falls behind because of weight and air resistance.

(in reply to LAKOTA169)
Post #: 8
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/5/2006 5:36:57 PM   
horatio102


Posts: 2233
Joined: 2/2/2005
Status: offline
Ok, that's a 2wd, what about the 4wd ones?


_____________________________

99 WJ Laredo v8 4x4

91 Mustang GT Roadster

90 Miata

05 Legacy GT Limited wagon

(in reply to Dakota736)
Post #: 9
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/5/2006 8:26:46 PM   
Dakota736

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 2/4/2006
Status: offline
Well with the 4x4 ram they will win off the line and then fall behind once traction is not an issue for the R/T. Another thing is the 4x4 ram will weigh about 500 more pounds then the the 2wd version.

(in reply to horatio102)
Post #: 10
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/5/2006 9:11:33 PM   
CYCLONE_06


Posts: 294
Joined: 7/21/2004
Status: offline
The rams are sluggish. If you get a bone stock hemi and race a bone stock R/T Dak, the Dak should win, because of the torque, and the weight difference. I wish I could pull up next to a Hemi ram, Id love to race one. Funny thing is, when I take my R/T out, nobody ever wants to race ;)

~CYCLONE_06

_____________________________

"It's been said winning isn't everything... Just not by me."
--Mark Martin

(in reply to Dakota736)
Post #: 11
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/6/2006 5:22:00 PM   
horatio102


Posts: 2233
Joined: 2/2/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dakota736

Well with the 4x4 ram they will win off the line and then fall behind once traction is not an issue for the R/T. Another thing is the 4x4 ram will weigh about 500 more pounds then the the 2wd version.


And what about the 4x4 5.9 dakota is what I was asking, not a 4x4 Ram against a 2wd dakota.


_____________________________

99 WJ Laredo v8 4x4

91 Mustang GT Roadster

90 Miata

05 Legacy GT Limited wagon

(in reply to Dakota736)
Post #: 12
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/6/2006 5:55:43 PM   
28this


Posts: 349
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
28this's photo gallery
I know of a 5.9 that isn't even classified as an R/T and still have yet to hear of a 5.7 being able to smoke it. It is also 8 yrs old with 80,000 mi and all stalk, except k&n air filter/intake tube.

_____________________________

There's no such word as can't. You can do anything, when you set your mind to it.

My new ride:
00 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited
4.7L V8
Infinity Sound System
Leather
All the Bells and Whistles

(in reply to horatio102)
Post #: 13
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/6/2006 6:19:11 PM   
Dakota736

 

Posts: 46
Joined: 2/4/2006
Status: offline
4x4 dakota with a 5.9 would be pritty nasty. As all of you know our Dakotas can have some traction issues in 2wd and with 4x4 on the street your looking at a pritty good launch. The more you go back and forth the dakota is going to win 4x4 or not. it all comes down to weight.

(in reply to 28this)
Post #: 14
RE: 5.9 dakota vs 5.7 ram - 2/7/2006 10:57:40 AM   
SinCity R/T

 

Posts: 308
Joined: 10/14/2004
Status: offline
SinCity R/T's photo gallery
I have seen both RC and QC Hemi Rams run at LVMS, and the times I ran when my CC R/T was stock were faster (15.7 vs. ~16.2-16.5). I also lined up against a RC Hemi Ram with a Programmer, Headers, Exhaust, etc. on the street in my '01 R/T which had comparable bolt-ons and pulled on him pretty strong.

As with the 4.7L vs. 5.9L Dakota controversy, I think a lot of it has to do with driver experience rather than the hardware in general.

_____________________________

SinCity R/T
1999 Dakota R/T - 11.93 @ 113.76
2007 Charger SRT-8
Dodge Truck Parts Information


(in reply to Dakota736)
Post #: 15
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
 
Dodge >> Dodge Trucks >> Dodge Dakota >> 2nd Gen Dakota
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21161
badstratrt20848
midnight17869
vipergts14501
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912450
steve05ram3611410
nickoman0110864
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.