Dodge Dodge Forum
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

RE: mustang vs charger??

  Printable Version
Dodge >> Dodge Cars >> Dodge Charger >> RE: mustang vs charger?? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/19/2006 12:13:33 PM   
74scamp

 

Posts: 1239
Joined: 1/25/2006
From: Los Lunas, ,NM
Status: offline
74scamp's photo gallery
Soooo, are you kind of saying the samething, only better, than I did? I know every car I have ever had, when driven back to the midwest (Iowa/Illinois areas), ran bunches better, i.e., stronger, than here. They didn't get better gas mileage, but boy, what a difference that heavy air made. I'm hoping (with all my heart) to be able to make a trip back that way this fall. That should be the telling sign. Heck, even a little Yamaha IT=175 motorcycle I had would loft the front end in third gear back there!

I would think the fella with the Denver Saleen was running way too rich in Pitt. I suppose with computers in the cars now that that is compensated for as altitude changes - go lower, lean it out and vise versa. We have to run pretty lean jets in carbs here and really mess with idle adjustment and air screws to get carbs to run really good.

That picture was shortly after I bought the car and only had the CAI installed. Thanks for the compliment. I'm approaching 60, and I really love my Charger

dave


< Message edited by 74scamp -- 5/19/2006 12:18:19 PM >

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 61
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/19/2006 12:53:17 PM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20755
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
so your first official act was to get those unneeded extra layers of rubber off?

i would think that if you were achieving a perfect mixture in denver, that when there was more oxygen in pittsburgh, you would run lean...an extreme example would be taking an untuned car, and putting alot of nitrous to it....since the point of the nitrous is to introduce compounded amounts of oxygen into the combustion process...

right? or am i backwards?

and while i am not a huge fan of the charger, i definately see the allure...but the charger just isnt for me...im glad that so many people do like them though...

< Message edited by BadStratRT -- 5/19/2006 12:54:50 PM >


_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to 74scamp)
Post #: 62
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/19/2006 2:19:21 PM   
Hemifyd

 

Posts: 61
Joined: 4/23/2006
Status: offline
To be honest I haven't been to the track, but I know that the Jet stage 2 is advancing the timing due to the ping when it is over 100 degrees at 4000 RPM. I have asked prior but no one exactly knows what the JET chip does. I presume tricking the mass air flow sensor to think it is at a higher altitude or something of the like, but dyno results do show a 13 hp increase. With the vehicle at stock on the Superchips I do not have the detonation situation so timing has to be effected. Bosting the octane over 95 has seemed to cure it.

As far as my reasoning towards the SRT-300 C performance manufacturing variances have been known to cause increases or decreases in HP from like car to like car on the assembly line which may account for part of it. My previous track time could also effect my ability to hang as well as having the programer set so I can manually shift at a much higher RPM. A lot of factors to consider out side of HP and Torque... a lot.

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 63
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/19/2006 7:55:59 PM   
74scamp

 

Posts: 1239
Joined: 1/25/2006
From: Los Lunas, ,NM
Status: offline
74scamp's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: BadStratRT

so your first official act was to get those unneeded extra layers of rubber off?

i would think that if you were achieving a perfect mixture in denver, that when there was more oxygen in pittsburgh, you would run lean...an extreme example would be taking an untuned car, and putting alot of nitrous to it....since the point of the nitrous is to introduce compounded amounts of oxygen into the combustion process...

right? or am i backwards?

and while i am not a huge fan of the charger, i definately see the allure...but the charger just isnt for me...im glad that so many people do like them though...


Just HATE the first layer of rubber .

OK, have to rethink this mixture problem the guy from Denver had. He would have been running, ummm, way too lien in Pitt. You're right. Sorry. I got myself confused (well, I'm on medication). He should have gone to fatter jets, and probably more air and maaybe a bit more timing in Pitt, depends on what his engine wanted. But definitely fatter jets to take advantage of the heavy air. I'm surprised he didn't burn a piston, or worse.

dave

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 64
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/19/2006 10:14:22 PM   
kOnO


Posts: 76
Joined: 4/18/2006
Status: offline
kOnO's photo gallery
So what does one need to do to a Charger Daytona to allow it to shed a layer of rubber like that?


kOnO




_____________________________

Top Banana #1199

MORE smiles per mile

(in reply to 74scamp)
Post #: 65
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/19/2006 10:51:07 PM   
Rivalry

 

Posts: 106
Joined: 4/14/2006
Status: offline
one foot on the brake and the other on the gas!

(in reply to kOnO)
Post #: 66
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/19/2006 11:38:38 PM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20755
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
correct....any hemi powered LX car should be able to do some killer brake stands...just like dave did...

_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to Rivalry)
Post #: 67
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/20/2006 2:14:46 PM   
mikcle

 

Posts: 31
Joined: 4/4/2006
Status: offline
Get the Charger! I get the most looks from Mustang drivers. Just like Vette theres a Mustang in every third F*cking driveway.

(in reply to magnethead)
Post #: 68
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/20/2006 3:02:47 PM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20755
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
hell, even when i had the charger rental, i had people gawking at the car...

_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to mikcle)
Post #: 69
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/20/2006 9:17:14 PM   
black_tang_gang

 

Posts: 7
Joined: 5/20/2006
Status: offline
i ran upon a str8 charger thursday in a local city here. it was blue. i loved the way it looked and when i pulled up to the guy he had a gorgeous chic with him. i was telling him i liked his car and the prick dissed mine. its a 95 GT thats in need of paint. he was like" dude you shouldnt pull up to a light beside a car like this with that beat up tang. hell, i wanted to cuss the guy. i was like, "dude, drop it on green and we'll see what this ole gt has". he said it had 395 hp. i never read anything on so i didnt know if he was telling the truth or not. i got him by like 6 cars in a distance of between 1/4 and 1/8 mile. he wouldnt pull up beside me again i bet his girl ragged on him hrd. i hate guys like that!! but it did run good...ive put double in my motor compared to what my cars even worth though is what he didnt know.
but back to the thread. i like the charger and the gto better than the new tangs. im just not into that retro look. a tricked out GTO looks good with wheels and lowering job. ive never seen a tricked charger but i bet theyed look sweet. best looking 4 door ive ever seen i trhink. i pick either over a new tang. im an sn95 fan myself its takes all i have to pull a car on a GTO though. theyre pretty mean.

< Message edited by black_tang_gang -- 5/20/2006 9:18:56 PM >

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 70
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/20/2006 11:42:20 PM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20755
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
you are the only person whom i have ever heard call a mustang a tang...dont you mean "stang"?

what is done to your 95 gt, and what does it run...

the srt8 has an advertised 425hp, but that has been proven to be under rated...

_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to black_tang_gang)
Post #: 71
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 5/21/2006 12:24:44 PM   
74scamp

 

Posts: 1239
Joined: 1/25/2006
From: Los Lunas, ,NM
Status: offline
74scamp's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: kOnO

So what does one need to do to a Charger Daytona to allow it to shed a layer of rubber like that?


kOnO





kOnO - mines not a Daytona, straight R/T. I did have a CAI on it at the time that pic was taken, though. Just stand on the brake and start giving it gas - gradually. Don't hammer it right away - at least I didn't. I let the tires get started gradually, then pounded away. mannnnnnnny

dave

dave

(in reply to kOnO)
Post #: 72
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 6/10/2006 9:27:11 PM   
03SPRAYINHEMI

 

Posts: 45
Joined: 6/6/2006
Status: offline
i bet the srt8 charger will smoke a mustang gt though

(in reply to nickoman01)
Post #: 73
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 6/11/2006 1:34:09 AM   
GoManGo_1269

 

Posts: 32
Joined: 5/24/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ViperGTS

quote:

gas isn't expensive, i hate how everyone shits a brick about it.


Let's say the car gets 18Mpg and 18K per year...

$3.00 for 1gal = 18 mile

$30.00 for 10gal = 180 miles

$300.00 for 100 gal = 1,800 mile

$3,000 gal for 1000 gal = 18,000 miles

For a poor college student who can't spare more then $5, wouldn't cheaper gas saving you hundreds, be a positive for you? Unless it's the complaining you're complaining about. I think it does get annoying hearing to people complain about gas prices, especially on the news, but they have every right intention and good reasons too.. Just my 2 cents.

-Matt-


Ok, so lets assume your poor college student decides to get a honda instead that gets 25 mpg. (keep in mind this college student isn't that poor or he wouldn't be looking at cars that cost $30K but I digress....

25mpg - 18mpg = 7 miles for each additional gallon of gas.

If your student drove 15,000 miles per year (a reasonable average) that would equate to

Charger = 15,000 \ 18 = 833 gallons of gas.

Honda = 15,000 \ 25 = 600 gallons of gas.

233 gallons of gas at $3.00/gallon is $699.00 / year extra to drive the Charger.

So it is an extra $58.50 / month ($14.62/week) to drive a charger with 340hp vs a honda with 200 (or so). Alot of money, but not enough to base a $30,000 car purchase on.

Michael

Edit was due to my lacking math skills..

PS - I stand by the previous point, gas is an expense, but its not worth basing the car you purchase and have to live with on.

< Message edited by GoManGo_1269 -- 6/11/2006 9:37:17 AM >

(in reply to ViperGTS)
Post #: 74
RE: mustang vs charger?? - 6/11/2006 1:47:55 AM   
snobrdrdan

 

Posts: 716
Joined: 11/13/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: black_tang_gang

i ran upon a str8 charger thursday in a local city here. it was blue



The SRT-8 Charger is only available in Silver, Black, & Inferno Red


_____________________________


2005 DAKOTA QUAD SLT V-8 -- SOLD

(in reply to black_tang_gang)
Post #: 75
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

 
 
Dodge Forums >> Dodge Cars >> Dodge Charger
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21040
badstratrt20755
midnight17495
vipergts14475
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912435
steve05ram3611346
nickoman0110864
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.