Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang
Login  | |
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/4/2005 7:48:07 PM
|
|
|
Avenger39
Posts: 215
Joined: 3/31/2005
Status: offline
|
Why not the charger srt-8?
_____________________________
1998 Dodge Avenger
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/4/2005 8:20:40 PM
|
|
|
ManMuscle
Posts: 66
Joined: 12/3/2004
Status: offline
|
What kind f comparison is that? Its houdl be the The R/T, GT and GTO.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/4/2005 8:25:02 PM
|
|
|
nickoman01
The Only Elite DF Member
Posts: 10864
Joined: 7/3/2004
From: The Ghetto of Northville
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Challenger Lover
Well I mean the
Dodge Charger 2005 R/T Hemi
Pontiac GTO 2006
Ford Mustang 2006 GT500
how come you only have 2 cars that exist. correct me if I'm wrong, but Ive never seen or heard about a 2005 charger.
_____________________________
“No one is above the law (except me) and no one is beneath its protection.”
quote:
ORIGINAL: Frenchy
It's only gay if you cum.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/4/2005 9:05:59 PM
|
|
|
Challenger Lover
Posts: 2438
Joined: 4/3/2005
From: Quebec Canada
Status: offline
|
Well Charger 2006 sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/4/2005 9:07:51 PM
|
|
|
Challenger Lover
Posts: 2438
Joined: 4/3/2005
From: Quebec Canada
Status: offline
|
Look I choose the GT500 because it got around 400 hp like the new GTO so .... i won't take a GT with around 300 hp
What could be interesting is the SRT-8 vs an eventually GTO SS !!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/4/2005 9:11:37 PM
|
|
|
Challenger Lover
Posts: 2438
Joined: 4/3/2005
From: Quebec Canada
Status: offline
|
Can someone tell how can i put pictures plz
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/4/2005 10:24:35 PM
|
|
|
BadStratRT
Posts: 20755
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
|
it really should be the charger srt8/gto/cobra
and in the end, its not a good comparison because you cant expect the bigger heavier 4 door sedan charger that doesnt come with a stick shift to compete with the manual trans gto and stang coupes...
_____________________________
A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.
Rules Number 3 and 7.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/5/2005 12:55:42 AM
|
|
|
SHAPman
Posts: 1409
Joined: 2/4/2004
From: Warren MI. Home to Rams and Dakotas
Status: offline
|
Well according to Creed and his misfits nobody wants coupes. And according to dodge it has "coupe-like styling" so compare away as far as I'm concerned. Shouldn't practicality be part of a performance car?
Joe
_____________________________
quote:
ORIGINAL: BadStratRT
GO BLUE!!
BIG TEN RULES!!!!
Lost your job yet? Keep buying foreign, you will.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/5/2005 12:01:34 PM
|
|
|
BadStratRT
Posts: 20755
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
|
are you serious? i can never tell who is being sarcastic on here anymore...
_____________________________
A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.
Rules Number 3 and 7.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/5/2005 12:58:18 PM
|
|
|
ManMuscle
Posts: 66
Joined: 12/3/2004
Status: offline
|
He's right. The Charger is being marketed as "the complete muscle car package" and the brochure says "All real muscle cars have a hemi" so they consider the car a mucle car. And the Charger having an automoatic isnt that big of a deal, if your on the strip your probably better off unless your a quick shifter. Also I dunno the specs of the Cobra but the SRT-8 has more HP then the GTO anyway. About 25 more HP. So I guess its a decent comparison. I'd personally take the charger over both, considering I saw then all at the autoshow in NYup close, and buddy of mine was at the Ny show the night they were taking the cars out becuase a friend of hers worked for Infiniti and he was taking thier cars out so she got in w/ him, and she saw then driving the SRT-8 and V6 out the Javits center and she said the SRT-8 sounded incredible. And event the V6 sounded deep and throaty.
As a side note, she also saw then rolling the Firepower of its display and it slipped off the beams or whatever they were using to take it down w/ and it fell and slammed the bottom of the car scrathing it. She said they messed it up. Someones gonna be in deep S*&T.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparaison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/5/2005 3:44:41 PM
|
|
|
BadStratRT
Posts: 20755
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
|
i think what you meant was "in case you dont know how to shift, the auto in the charger is better."
there is a reason that the manual GTO is faster than the auto GTO...and there is a reason that the Manual Cobra and GT are faster than the auto GT and cobra (if available)...
find me a car that has put out better performance numbers with an auto than with a stickshift.
and more horsepower doesnt mean much...the charger is a bigger heavier car, and you cant take horsepower as a comparision, you have to take lbs per horsepower...im sure the charger is lacking heavily there. also, sport suspension and gearing are not being taken into consideration, whick im SURE the GTO and Cobra have the defined advantage...
dodge has not made a mucle car...they have made a sedan. you want a fair comparison, compare it to the Maxima or altima SE-R...not a bunch of hipo coupes.
_____________________________
A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.
Rules Number 3 and 7.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/5/2005 5:04:26 PM
|
|
|
nickoman01
The Only Elite DF Member
Posts: 10864
Joined: 7/3/2004
From: The Ghetto of Northville
Status: offline
|
the charger srt8 weights 4160 pounds. divide that by 425hp and it equals 1 horsepower for every 9.788 pounds.
the Pontiac gto weights 3725 pounds. divide that by 400hp and it equals 1 horsepower for every 9.313 pounds.
and the mustang doesn't count, because they cheat and use a supercharger, since ford engines suck ass.
_____________________________
“No one is above the law (except me) and no one is beneath its protection.”
quote:
ORIGINAL: Frenchy
It's only gay if you cum.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/5/2005 5:51:09 PM
|
|
|
BadStratRT
Posts: 20755
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
|
well, i dont care if it has the aide of a jet engine..at the track, heads up, there is no cheating. how about final drive ratio? rear end gear ratio? suspension aides for traction?
_____________________________
A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.
Rules Number 3 and 7.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Comparison -- Charger/GTO/Mustang - 4/5/2005 9:22:55 PM
|
|
|
Challenger Lover
Posts: 2438
Joined: 4/3/2005
From: Quebec Canada
Status: offline
|
Well ... I have to say that something is pretty strange with these ''new muscles cars'', the mustang GT got 2 doors but the charger Daytona, R/T which version you want, all 4 doors I think, well im only 15 and I mostly love Hemi but the new charger, dont know a lot about it, and finaly the GTO maybe they will make an SS or something like this, 2 doors this one, well a 4 door charger, it su**
That's all I can say
Look there is so many version of these car
Charger SRT-8 // Daytona R/T // Hemi
Ford Mustang GT // maybe cobra ? // GT500
And the only GTO
|
|
|
|
 Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
Make A Donation
Forum Rules & FAQ
RSS Feeds
SRT Forums
Race News
Dodge Prices
Dodge Trucks & SUVs
Ram  Dakota
Durango Nitro
Dodge Cars
Avenger Intrepid
Caliber Magnum
Challenger Neon
Charger Stealth
Daytona Stratus
Dodge Viper
Advertising Info
|
Contact Us |
Link To Us |
Sitemap |
Archive |
Advertising |
Automotive Directory |
About Us |
Dodge Links |
Legal |
Privacy Policy |
© Dodge Forum
Harley Davidson |
Ford Mustang Forums |
Dodge Challenger
Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.
|
Printable Version
