Dodge Dodge Forum
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3

  Printable Version
Dodge >> Dodge Cars >> Dodge Daytona >> 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/15/2005 8:44:33 AM   
js87z

 

Posts: 64
Joined: 5/19/2004
Status: offline
hi you all it has been awhile i have a project in mind with my daytona when i make it back state side i should have some money saved to start it. but before i get started i need to know a few things how do you actaul make this 2.3 with a 2.2 and 2.5 cuz i think i want to do that as a base and add some goodies like ported head and intake and exhuast manifolds. slightly larger turbo and a mild prformance cam. i kinda want to make it an every day driver with around 300hp would be nice i could use some input on what i should do to get that as my final product any help would be great thanks
Post #: 1
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/17/2005 8:11:20 PM   
GTCandGTSturbo


Posts: 328
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Livonia, MI
Status: offline
Whats your budget? To make 300hp everyday reliably, your going to need a commonblock with forged pistons, a S60 or T3/T4 hybrid and a big IC. Then fuel system upgrades and a cal. Then I hope your tranny and axles are up to it. Also need specs on what you are starting with. I dont know what you are talking about with the 2.3l. Even a 2.2 bored out alot wont make it a 2.3 I believe.

< Message edited by GTCandGTSturbo -- 3/17/2005 8:12:31 PM >


_____________________________

92 Lebaron GTC Turbo
Shelby Lancer #79
2004 Wrangler Rubicon

(in reply to js87z)
Post #: 2
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/18/2005 9:42:39 PM   
Turbobearcat

 

Posts: 132
Joined: 2/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: GTCandGTSturbo

Whats your budget? To make 300hp everyday reliably, your going to need a commonblock with forged pistons, a S60 or T3/T4 hybrid and a big IC. Then fuel system upgrades and a cal. Then I hope your tranny and axles are up to it. Also need specs on what you are starting with. I dont know what you are talking about with the 2.3l. Even a 2.2 bored out alot wont make it a 2.3 I believe.


I think your right about one thing, he has no idea what he's talking about but that's the reason why he's asking the questions.

1. 2.2L bored out will give you more torque but as much as a 2.5L will.
2. raise the Boost pressue.. which brings you to a grainger valve and maybe more mods.. it depends on what you plan on doing with the car.. larger injectors, calibrations... you do need to start with the Common block motor, 89 and newer block.
3. Exhaust system size
4. port the head, intake and exhaust manifolds

don't forget to change the clutch setup to something that can hold the extra power.

so much to do if you want 300HP but for the amount of $$ you can spend, a turbo Dodge is cheaper than a V8 Chevy or Ford.



Bearcat

(in reply to GTCandGTSturbo)
Post #: 3
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/19/2005 1:38:46 PM   
71RoadRunner



Posts: 9543
Joined: 7/28/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
71RoadRunner's photo gallery
Glad to see that I'm not the only one that was wondering what the 2.3L thing was, I've never heard of combining the two to get that either.

_____________________________

71 Plymouth Roadrunner 440 Auto. Modified
04 Dodge SRT-4 2.4L DOHC Turbo Intercooled 5-spd. Modified

(in reply to GTCandGTSturbo)
Post #: 4
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/20/2005 4:42:52 AM   
js87z

 

Posts: 64
Joined: 5/19/2004
Status: offline
i read about this 2.3l when i was researching mods for the daytonas and on this one page they talk about taking the crank out of the 2.5 l short block and putting it into a 2.2l if i remember correctly and it makes like a 2.3l. i wasn't sure if any one else had heard of it or have tried it. i will try to find the web page again so i can show it to you guys. i should have a good couple grand saved up by the time i get home and my friend has a his own shop and is will to do the work and get the parts i need at his cost. he also has the abiltiy to port and polish the intake and exhuast manifolds. that should save me a good amount of money. i just wanted to see if any of you knoiw about this 2.3l. they say it creates alot of torque. so i thought it would be worth a shot to check it out.

(in reply to js87z)
Post #: 5
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/20/2005 8:12:19 AM   
Turbobearcat

 

Posts: 132
Joined: 2/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: js87z

i read about this 2.3l when i was researching mods for the daytonas and on this one page they talk about taking the crank out of the 2.5 l short block and putting it into a 2.2l if i remember correctly and it makes like a 2.3l. i wasn't sure if any one else had heard of it or have tried it. i will try to find the web page again so i can show it to you guys. i should have a good couple grand saved up by the time i get home and my friend has a his own shop and is will to do the work and get the parts i need at his cost. he also has the abiltiy to port and polish the intake and exhuast manifolds. that should save me a good amount of money. i just wanted to see if any of you knoiw about this 2.3l. they say it creates alot of torque. so i thought it would be worth a shot to check it out.


FRACK NO>>> I'm not sure where you got that one, disregaurd what you read and read wht I am about to post very very closely.
I've been in this business for 20 years in these cars and I can tell you the following information will help you out.

1.Swapping a 2.5L crank into a 2.2L will NOT get you a 2.3L...
Why do you ask? It's simple..the commonblock motor which came out in 89-94 used either crank..which is true..HOWEVER the pistons
are not the same which leads to piston height problems if you tried to use a 2.2L piston with a 2.5L crank.. the piston would be sticking
over the top of the block! so that tells you this is not a option.
2. There was a early 2.5L made but the block was 12mm taller than a 2.2L block..very hard to find, it has a 2.5L crank and 2.2L pistons but the deck height of the block makes up for the 2.2L pistons.
3. I know your going to ask about swapping cranks from older to newer... a BIGGER NO..
the old style block and the CBlock cranks are NOT interchanable for a few reason and believe me I found out the hard way ONCE and learned from the mistake.

If you want to make power bore out the block 30-40 over and buy some forged pistons, your stock pistons for a 2.2L will be fine for about 250hp if I'm not correct.. you will have more torque than a standard turbo 2.2L going this rout...but if you want torque that
can twist your nuts off, then find a 2.5L and enjoy.

Bearcat





Thumbnail Image


Attachment (1)

(in reply to js87z)
Post #: 6
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/20/2005 7:43:19 PM   
casper



Posts: 9606
Joined: 7/12/2004
Status: offline
casper's photo gallery
displacement = torque.

_____________________________

1998 Neon- Iceman intake, Pacesetter exhaust, Megan racing short shifter, Kirk Racing header, AFX solid race front mount, AFX solid bobble strut
Come play hood wars
http://www.hoodwar.com/register.php?REF=329

(in reply to Turbobearcat)
Post #: 7
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/20/2005 8:26:51 PM   
Turbobearcat

 

Posts: 132
Joined: 2/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: casper

displacement = torque.


A-Frackin'-men!

(in reply to casper)
Post #: 8
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/21/2005 4:34:35 AM   
js87z

 

Posts: 64
Joined: 5/19/2004
Status: offline
that is why i ask before i went out and tryied it. it sounded kinda odd to me and it didn't really make a hole lot of sence but i thought i would ask any way. i was planning on biuld a motor when i get home so would you say it would be better to biuld a 2.5 l instead of a 2.2 l ? i can get a 2.5 l block with ease but i already have the 2.2l . would there be any real major chance that would have to be done to do that kinda swap?

(in reply to js87z)
Post #: 9
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/21/2005 5:04:42 AM   
71RoadRunner



Posts: 9543
Joined: 7/28/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
71RoadRunner's photo gallery
Your almost always better off to use the biggest engine possible to start off with, the old saying, "there's no replacement for displacement" comes to mind here. This is always true, because the larger engines can be turbo and supercharged just like the smaller ones.

_____________________________

71 Plymouth Roadrunner 440 Auto. Modified
04 Dodge SRT-4 2.4L DOHC Turbo Intercooled 5-spd. Modified

(in reply to js87z)
Post #: 10
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/22/2005 5:11:58 AM   
casper



Posts: 9606
Joined: 7/12/2004
Status: offline
casper's photo gallery
It all depends on how crazy you wanna get, you could go all custom and put a hemi in there. It all depends on what you wanna do, but the bigger you start with the better your gonna be.

_____________________________

1998 Neon- Iceman intake, Pacesetter exhaust, Megan racing short shifter, Kirk Racing header, AFX solid race front mount, AFX solid bobble strut
Come play hood wars
http://www.hoodwar.com/register.php?REF=329

(in reply to 71RoadRunner)
Post #: 11
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/23/2005 9:56:22 PM   
Turbobearcat

 

Posts: 132
Joined: 2/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: js87z

that is why i ask before i went out and tryied it. it sounded kinda odd to me and it didn't really make a hole lot of sence but i thought i would ask any way. i was planning on biuld a motor when i get home so would you say it would be better to biuld a 2.5 l instead of a 2.2 l ? i can get a 2.5 l block with ease but i already have the 2.2l . would there be any real major chance that would have to be done to do that kinda swap?

What year 2.2L do you have...

remember what I said about boring out a 2.2L, to me it is the best of both worlds...you get alittle bit more displacement
and you keep your stroke the same...meaning you can still rev high.

you must remember a 2.5L does not rev as high as a 2.2L, if you not out drag racing, 2.5L will be good for you, if your racing then a 2.2L is your motor .


Bearcat

(in reply to js87z)
Post #: 12
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/23/2005 10:16:34 PM   
GTCandGTSturbo


Posts: 328
Joined: 10/21/2003
From: Livonia, MI
Status: offline
http://www.turbododge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70047

_____________________________

92 Lebaron GTC Turbo
Shelby Lancer #79
2004 Wrangler Rubicon

(in reply to Turbobearcat)
Post #: 13
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/24/2005 10:09:15 AM   
js87z

 

Posts: 64
Joined: 5/19/2004
Status: offline
i have an 87 shelby z with the 2.2l . i was planning on do some mild curciut racing at a track close to where i live. i was think about just getting another block so that i can drive the car til the new engine is all done. with all of the goodies and do the swap over the winter months. then i have a nice new fresh ride for the spring. i not that interested in doing the rear wheel drive coversion with what i want the car for. it just wouldn't be all that pratical to me. i guess what i want is an engine that will rev qiuckly and high or a nice balance between the two. so it kinda sound like a2.2 block might be a little better for my needs if i am understanding what you are all saying. and it has to have torque. torque wins races.

(in reply to js87z)
Post #: 14
RE: 2.2 and 2.5 making a 2.3 - 3/24/2005 4:45:50 PM   
Turbobearcat

 

Posts: 132
Joined: 2/26/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: js87z

i have an 87 shelby z with the 2.2l . i was planning on do some mild curciut racing at a track close to where i live. i was think about just getting another block so that i can drive the car til the new engine is all done. with all of the goodies and do the swap over the winter months. then i have a nice new fresh ride for the spring. i not that interested in doing the rear wheel drive coversion with what i want the car for. it just wouldn't be all that pratical to me. i guess what i want is an engine that will rev qiuckly and high or a nice balance between the two. so it kinda sound like a2.2 block might be a little better for my needs if i am understanding what you are all saying. and it has to have torque. torque wins races.

Bore out the 2.2L engine and you should have what your looking for..

(in reply to js87z)
Post #: 15
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
 
Dodge Forums >> Dodge Cars >> Dodge Daytona
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21161
badstratrt20848
midnight17869
vipergts14501
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912450
steve05ram3611410
nickoman0110864
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.