Dodge Dodge Forum
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

RE: How bout that Charger???

  Printable Version
Dodge Forum >> Dodge Cars >> Dodge Charger >> RE: How bout that Charger??? Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/2/2005 6:35:12 PM   
nickoman01



The Only Elite DF Member
Posts: 10864
Joined: 7/3/2004
From: The Ghetto of Northville
Status: offline
nickoman01's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: BadStratRT

a muscle car by its most basic definition cannot have four doors...this is a four door performance car.


label it whatever you want, but im happy that we have a 4 door v8 power that looks great

_____________________________

“No one is above the law (except me) and no one is beneath its protection.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: Frenchy
It's only gay if you cum.

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 91
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/3/2005 1:07:06 AM   
MG42pillbox


Posts: 411
Joined: 5/27/2004
Status: offline
Exactly nickoman01, and many people already agree with you.

_____________________________

Poor lil Chevys

(in reply to nickoman01)
Post #: 92
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/3/2005 11:58:16 AM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20848
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
im sure they do..just lik the poll..but like nicko said...long live the family car....didnt dodge make this mistake before??



_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to MG42pillbox)
Post #: 93
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/3/2005 12:38:01 PM   
wildbill


Posts: 376
Joined: 3/8/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: nickoman01
I'm excited because of a 4 door muscle car. it is like a better looking intrepid that doesnt have a **** enghine, and thats all i want


See... thats exactly how I feel. The car seems to put together several pieces as far as the Hemi engine, 4 doors, ohh that cherry paint, the displacment system (though I don't know much about how it truely works since I have never experienced it, the idea sounds cool), the price point already released...help me out, there are a ton more. I am actually curious to know all the details to what makes this charger better or different beyond these basics than other cars since I have a lot of room for growth in my car-knowledge.

As far as look that some people are squabbling about, I think the SRT-8 is a fine upgrade though even the standard model looks mean.

(in reply to nickoman01)
Post #: 94
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 4:30:03 AM   
MG42pillbox


Posts: 411
Joined: 5/27/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT, This is a perfect example why you will never work for Chryslers Marketing group.... With that line you just ruined the statement of performance meets everything else. The New Charger is nothing like the old, and calling that car an aries and a total insult.

_____________________________

Poor lil Chevys

(in reply to wildbill)
Post #: 95
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 10:59:40 AM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20848
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
no..i will never work for chrysler marketing group because i wasnt a marketing major...

and believe me..if this new aries doesnt sell like you guys think it will...there wil be PLENTY of openings with DCX...

i mean, i would love to see the car sell well, but just because 3 guys on DF think its the coolest thing ever, doesnt mean that the rest of the world does. for instance, have a look at the poll at the right of the forum...i dont like it simply because i dont want a sedan...im just not in the market for one...i dont care what DCX calls it..i would like a RWD coupe...i was hoping this would be it, as were many other people...

my bottom line is that i just dont need a big sedan...and neither do the others that are bitching about it...i dont know why DCX bothered with the charger, because they already have the 300, and the charger is just a 300 with a different body, whether you want to believe that or not..it is the same chassis, and the same driveline...with a different body...i just dont see the point in making another sedan...

reliant K
aries k...




_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to MG42pillbox)
Post #: 96
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 2:09:21 PM   
nickoman01



The Only Elite DF Member
Posts: 10864
Joined: 7/3/2004
From: The Ghetto of Northville
Status: offline
nickoman01's photo gallery
i voted yes on teh pole, because i misunderstood it. i voted yes because there shoudl be a coupe version ALSO, and that woudl keep your peopels damn mouths shut.

_____________________________

“No one is above the law (except me) and no one is beneath its protection.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: Frenchy
It's only gay if you cum.

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 97
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 2:20:02 PM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20848
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
im not saying that this car shouldnt exist..i just think that DCX should give those of us who would like a coupe an option...

_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to nickoman01)
Post #: 98
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 2:36:02 PM   
MG42pillbox


Posts: 411
Joined: 5/27/2004
Status: offline
Dont matter 4 Door Coronet was on the same frame as the Charger in the late 60s. the 06 Charger Is THEEE CHARGER, Not a Charger, It is The Current Charger in the world.

_____________________________

Poor lil Chevys

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 99
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 2:47:37 PM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20848
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
well, whatever..i dont care..its just another sedan, that alot of people who dont need a sedan, dont want...oh well..i have a coupe..im happy with it.

_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to MG42pillbox)
Post #: 100
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 2:56:54 PM   
MG42pillbox


Posts: 411
Joined: 5/27/2004
Status: offline
Well I am more concerned with real performance attributes, such as REAR WHEEL DRIVE, and 360 to 450hp American V8s, than I am about how many doors my cars has.

< Message edited by MG42pillbox -- 5/4/2005 2:57:32 PM >


_____________________________

Poor lil Chevys

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 101
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 5:40:39 PM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20848
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
unfortauntely the charger isnt in that range...although i do see your point, but at the same time, those of you who just want big hp numbers and dont care how the big car handles, you will continue spending your time watching the tail lights of the lighter coupes like mustangs GTOS, and vettes get smaller and smaller as they effortless handle the turns, and the strip.

_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to MG42pillbox)
Post #: 102
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 6:13:45 PM   
MG42pillbox


Posts: 411
Joined: 5/27/2004
Status: offline
LOL Maybe you see these tail lights more often than not. And seriously brush up on your math skills, the Charger more than qualifies for every attribute I just mentioned.

Range from 360 to 450, lets see,

Charger Daytona is listed at 350hp and really makes closer to 365 at the crank. I think thats in-between 360 to 450, And I dont even have to mention the Dayton because the Charger SRT-8 Is rated at 425hp and makes closer to 450+ HP LOL... Its not that complicated. 425 Is inbetween 360-450 Yet It really makes more HP. And with a few bolt-ons it will be 480 to 500hp range.

OHHH I almost forgot, the RT Charger Out handles the Stang GT Is the Slalom, So your way off on ever section buddy. This car isnt every in comparison to the Stang, Or Vett anyway and never was. Stop comparing apples to oranges. The new GTO is also not in the same class.........



< Message edited by MG42pillbox -- 5/4/2005 6:25:44 PM >


_____________________________

Poor lil Chevys

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 103
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 6:57:58 PM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20848
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
oh..youre right...i was talking about sports cars...not over priced sedans...

350 is BHP...not WHP...i dont know where you get your hp numbers...and where did you get the info that although the charger is listed at 425 it makes more like.450? show me a dynop sheet of either...you need to stop paper racing, 'buddy'...your arguement is just non-sense that you have rehashed from whatever you read...its not like dodge would just happen to fail to mention that their new charger actually makes an extra 25 or so hp....

.it isnt like youve seen a charger run in person and beat a mustang..and while i hate the mustang, i will believe that when i see it in a non biased forum...while i think the auto stang may be slower than the charger...the stang GT with a manual is running in the mid 13s...whereas the charger is not, if it is, i want to see video, and a time slip.

the SRT8 doesnt exist to the public yet...when its out, you can talk about it...and "a few bolt ons" doesnt mean anything..."with a few bolt ons" my mirada runs mid to low 12s...

and what sports car do you have that has made you the written authority on racing? i imagine that you will spout off about how you have this and that and they both run 9s...youve just never mentioned it before...

and for the record, i dont spend much time looking at tail lights...i dont drive an overweight family sedan, or a truck...

< Message edited by BadStratRT -- 5/4/2005 7:03:45 PM >


_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to MG42pillbox)
Post #: 104
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 5/4/2005 7:12:33 PM   
plum500

 

Posts: 138
Joined: 3/2/2005
Status: offline
I love when the defense falls back to say all that is important is performance. Yeah. Not only is that not a conversation about a Charger, it's kind of odd for a discussion about any car to most. But anyway...

Simple fact is, they built a car and slapped the name on it and are using the history for marketting. That's the simple fact. They didn't set out to build "a Charger" as already defined by what the majority of folks remember as "The Charger".

So you can like the car all you want, and call it a Charger cause I'll be damned if that isn't the name on it, but it most certainly is not "The Charger" let alone whether one considers it "A Charger" or not.

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 105
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

 
 
Dodge Forum >> Dodge Cars >> Dodge Charger
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21161
badstratrt20848
midnight17869
vipergts14501
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912450
steve05ram3611410
nickoman0110864
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.