Dodge Dodge Forum
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

RE: How bout that Charger???

  Printable Version
Dodge Forum >> Dodge Cars >> Dodge Charger >> RE: How bout that Charger??? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 3/28/2005 4:17:10 PM   
scatpackmopar

 

Posts: 215
Joined: 6/5/2004
Status: offline
Chrysler must be doing something right. They are making good profit with legendary names like HEMI, 300, Magnum and it will continue with the new Charger! Despite not looking like a 60's and 70's Charger.

(in reply to BadStratRT)
Post #: 46
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 3/28/2005 11:16:26 PM   
done

 

Posts: 76
Joined: 11/12/2004
Status: offline
To add to the discussion, compare the performance figures in the following link to those of the Charger SRT 8

http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/dodge-charger/dodge-charger-history.shtml

Now consider the handling, braking, ride quality, fit and finsh, rust reistance, electronics, convenince fetures, etc. of the old Chargers to the new one. Maybe two doors is your thing, but the new one is a better car.


_____________________________

Black RT AWD

http://www.watsoncard.com/magnum

(in reply to scatpackmopar)
Post #: 47
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/4/2005 5:56:58 PM   
wildbill


Posts: 376
Joined: 3/8/2005
Status: offline
I've been coming across some photos of the new Dodge Charger including the SRT-8. Personally, I really like the new look. Their is history behind this car but it even with the four doors I think it looks real nice and more practical. I’m looking forward to seeing one on the road...

(in reply to done)
Post #: 48
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/5/2005 7:25:27 AM   
TeeWJay426


Posts: 1253
Joined: 9/16/2004
Status: offline
TeeWJay426's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: done

Now consider the handling, braking, ride quality, fit and finsh, rust reistance, electronics, convenince fetures, etc. of the old Chargers to the new one. Maybe two doors is your thing, but the new one is a better car.



If that's the criteria you want to use for comparison, a new Hyundai is a better car than the old Charger technologically. Doesn't mean that I want to drive one of them either.

_____________________________

'66 Hemi Charger
'67 Coronet R/T ragtop
'03 Hemi Ram 2500 QC 4x4
'99 Durango
'98 Intrepid ES
'93 Caravan (R.I.P.)

(in reply to done)
Post #: 49
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/5/2005 10:00:52 AM   
nickoman01



The Only Elite DF Member
Posts: 10863
Joined: 7/3/2004
From: The Ghetto of Northville
Status: offline
nickoman01's photo gallery

quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeWJay426

quote:

ORIGINAL: done

Now consider the handling, braking, ride quality, fit and finsh, rust reistance, electronics, convenince fetures, etc. of the old Chargers to the new one. Maybe two doors is your thing, but the new one is a better car.



If that's the criteria you want to use for comparison, a new Hyundai is a better car than the old Charger


so true, glad you realize that. even new kias are better then old chargers.


_____________________________

“No one is above the law (except me) and no one is beneath its protection.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: Frenchy
It's only gay if you cum.

(in reply to TeeWJay426)
Post #: 50
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/5/2005 11:48:56 AM   
plum500

 

Posts: 138
Joined: 3/2/2005
Status: offline
You're funny.

(in reply to nickoman01)
Post #: 51
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/5/2005 6:25:15 PM   
wildbill


Posts: 376
Joined: 3/8/2005
Status: offline
I was reading up on this charger, can anyone explain to me what a multiple displacement system does and how it saves gas? Thanx.

(in reply to plum500)
Post #: 52
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/5/2005 10:30:26 PM   
nickoman01



The Only Elite DF Member
Posts: 10863
Joined: 7/3/2004
From: The Ghetto of Northville
Status: offline
nickoman01's photo gallery
it works by shutting off 4 cylinders. so it saves gas by running off of 4 cylinders. it only comes in effect at cruising speeds on the highway, but it will instantly change back to 8 cylinders when the power is demanded.

_____________________________

“No one is above the law (except me) and no one is beneath its protection.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: Frenchy
It's only gay if you cum.

(in reply to wildbill)
Post #: 53
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/8/2005 9:12:47 AM   
wildbill


Posts: 376
Joined: 3/8/2005
Status: offline
Gotcha. Thats a cool idea. How much gas are we talking about here? Is it like only using 50% of the gas since only running on 50% of cylinders?

(in reply to nickoman01)
Post #: 54
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/8/2005 5:09:26 PM   
nickoman01



The Only Elite DF Member
Posts: 10863
Joined: 7/3/2004
From: The Ghetto of Northville
Status: offline
nickoman01's photo gallery
you are supposed to get 20% better gas mileage

_____________________________

“No one is above the law (except me) and no one is beneath its protection.”

quote:

ORIGINAL: Frenchy
It's only gay if you cum.

(in reply to wildbill)
Post #: 55
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/8/2005 11:33:41 PM   
done

 

Posts: 76
Joined: 11/12/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TeeWJay426

quote:

ORIGINAL: done

Now consider the handling, braking, ride quality, fit and finsh, rust reistance, electronics, convenince fetures, etc. of the old Chargers to the new one. Maybe two doors is your thing, but the new one is a better car.



If that's the criteria you want to use for comparison, a new Hyundai is a better car than the old Charger technologically. Doesn't mean that I want to drive one of them either.



You are taking that statement out of context. The new Charger RT and SRT are also faster than the old chargers. Hyundai and Kias may well be better than the old Chargers except for size and power.

That still makes the new Charger a better car than the old ones. Two doors and style are only personal preferences, not measures of quality.



< Message edited by done -- 4/8/2005 11:34:08 PM >


_____________________________

Black RT AWD

http://www.watsoncard.com/magnum

(in reply to TeeWJay426)
Post #: 56
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/11/2005 3:05:28 PM   
wildbill


Posts: 376
Joined: 3/8/2005
Status: offline
And I doubt many folks will be as scared with a Kia or Hyundai cop car driving up behind them rather than a Charger cop car.

You guys have seen the pics in the other thread right? What you think of the Charger possibily being used for police work? (actually is it a done deal that it will be a cop car or are they trying to sell it as an option right now?)

(in reply to done)
Post #: 57
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/11/2005 5:07:35 PM   
done

 

Posts: 76
Joined: 11/12/2004
Status: offline
The power to make your stomach tighten is not the cop car, it is the cop in the car. Cars don't make the arrest and you still can't outrun a radio.


_____________________________

Black RT AWD

http://www.watsoncard.com/magnum

(in reply to wildbill)
Post #: 58
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/12/2005 12:43:30 AM   
SHAPman


Posts: 1409
Joined: 2/4/2004
From: Warren MI. Home to Rams and Dakotas
Status: offline
SHAPman's photo gallery
How can you say the new chargers are faster, only the srt can run with a hemi, and its almost the same.
"As an all-around performer, the all-new 2006 Dodge Charger SRT8 is capable of awe-inspiring numbers unheard-of in a muscle sedan: 0-60 mph in around 5 seconds, quarter-mile time in the 13-second range "


"Performance: 426 Hemi V8 425: 0-60 in 5.5 sec, 1/4 mile in 13.9 sec @ 105mph."

Now consider this, 30 plus years have passed, and the best that they got is the same numbers from 30 years ago. Also remember the 70 chargers weigh a considerable amount more. So with all the technology, electronics, and weight reductions they still can't beat the original. Yes I'm the sure the new one will handle better, and ride better. But in 30 years a 69 charger will still be a much more desired car than the current version.

Joe


_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: BadStratRT

GO BLUE!!

BIG TEN RULES!!!!



Lost your job yet? Keep buying foreign, you will.

(in reply to done)
Post #: 59
RE: How bout that Charger??? - 4/12/2005 11:51:41 AM   
BadStratRT




Posts: 20740
Joined: 3/19/2004
Status: offline
BadStratRT's photo gallery
come on joe..dont be silly...

the old charger didnt come with an option of 18 inch wheels...or a 650 watt system...or heated pedals or mirrors or a seat that massages your ass when you drive or whatever other worthless option that has been packed into this newest family sedan offered by DCX...

because we all know, beaing able to hear your system 2 blocks away, and having gawdy shiney rims and warm feet and a comfy massaged ass are far more important than the potential to go fast...

_____________________________

A True Dodge Enthusiast with a vehicle history to prove it.

Rules Number 3 and 7.

(in reply to SHAPman)
Post #: 60
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

 
 
Dodge >> Dodge Cars >> Dodge Charger
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21005
badstratrt20740
midnight17429
vipergts14468
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912435
steve05ram3611328
nickoman0110863
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.