Dodge Dodge Forum Viper
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

RE: durango r/t

  Printable Version
Dodge Forums >> Dodge SUVs >> Dodge Durango >> 1st Gen Durango >> RE: durango r/t Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: durango r/t - 2/10/2005 5:54:19 PM   
Kensai


Posts: 1652
Joined: 12/30/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
I finally took some pics of my 2000 cluster to show you my speed/rpm range. But I do not know how to put attachments on this site. HOw do you add attachments?

(in reply to Kensai)
Post #: 16
RE: durango r/t - 2/11/2005 6:56:16 PM   
Kensai


Posts: 1652
Joined: 12/30/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
I think I figured out how to attach files. Here goes.





Thumbnail Image



Thumbnail Image


Attachment (2)

< Message edited by Kensai -- 2/11/2005 6:59:01 PM >

(in reply to Kensai)
Post #: 17
RE: durango r/t - 2/11/2005 11:00:40 PM   
Last Of The R/Ts


Posts: 1074
Joined: 11/13/2004
Status: offline
Yeah I know for a fact my truck does not have to push that hard to get to 70mph. As far as the geographical areas and the gas subject goes, my truck was purchased in High Point, NC and it does not mention premium at all. My cousin who owns a 2001 R/T and lives in Jersey has the same deal, no mention of premium at all. I guess we just lucked out......

_____________________________


2003 Dodge Durango R/T

(in reply to Kensai)
Post #: 18
RE: durango r/t - 2/12/2005 5:02:46 PM   
Kensai


Posts: 1652
Joined: 12/30/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
I gues in some geographical areas, premium is not required? I know that in Denver, their Super unleaded is rated like 89 octane. I guess it is because they are so far up in altitude that premium octane would be a waste of money??

Here in Dallas-Fort Worth, Premium Octane ratings are 93 and unleaded is 87 octane. Midgrade is 89.

(in reply to Last Of The R/Ts)
Post #: 19
RE: durango r/t - 2/16/2005 6:23:48 PM   
b_smith_r/t


Posts: 56
Joined: 2/9/2005
Status: offline
hey guys,

i currently drive a 99 dalota r/t with the 3.92 gear and average 17-18 on the highway at 75 mph. I drove that from NC to TX and it got the same all the way there and bck.
Also my truck says nothing about having to use premium fuel at all but i do use mid grade here in NC (89) and no pinging or detno. i have flows and a custom hand built air intake. I run about 2200 rpm at 70 mph. So i gues where all a little different -lol

B-Rad
99 Kota R/T

_____________________________

99 kota r/t black on grey leather
custom hand built air intake 3" polish stainless
accel coil- shorty headers hi temp paint silver
flowmaster-dump loud

(in reply to Kensai)
Post #: 20
RE: durango r/t - 2/16/2005 7:42:34 PM   
Kensai


Posts: 1652
Joined: 12/30/2003
From: United States
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: b_smith_r/t

hey guys,

i currently drive a 99 dalota r/t with the 3.92 gear and average 17-18 on the highway at 75 mph. I drove that from NC to TX and it got the same all the way there and bck.
Also my truck says nothing about having to use premium fuel at all but i do use mid grade here in NC (89) and no pinging or detno. i have flows and a custom hand built air intake. I run about 2200 rpm at 70 mph. So i gues where all a little different -lol

B-Rad
99 Kota R/T


Seems like your Dak eng/tranny closer matches up to mine as my pic shows around 2200 at 70 mph. But the 2001 thru 2003's, I guess they have a slightly taller overdrive gear and they are barely pushing past 2000 rpms at 70 mph.

I'll find the page in my 2000 manual that states premium required and take a pic of it. Will also take a pic of my fuel door that shows premium required sticker.

I am now pretty sure that requiring premium for highest performance must be based on what geographical area and altitude you live in?

(in reply to b_smith_r/t)
Post #: 21
RE: durango r/t - 2/27/2005 5:08:51 PM   
Rick980

 

Posts: 54
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
I have a 2003 R/T 250 HP 345 Torque.....living in Canada, purchased it here also. No mention of using premium grade fuel, runs great other than mileage, no ping or knock.

(in reply to b_smith_r/t)
Post #: 22
RE: durango r/t - 2/27/2005 7:53:10 PM   
Last Of The R/Ts


Posts: 1074
Joined: 11/13/2004
Status: offline
I think we have clearly established that not all Durangos require premium grade fuel. There are a select few that have been unfortunate enough to receive some of these. It is just a case by case basis.

_____________________________


2003 Dodge Durango R/T

(in reply to Rick980)
Post #: 23
RE: durango r/t - 2/28/2005 7:41:11 PM   
b_salgado

 

Posts: 16
Joined: 2/20/2005
Status: offline
02 R/T here. Only 28,000 miles on it. No premium fuel required either. As for the RPM issue... I played with it on Thurs night. At 64-66 MPH The tach reads 2000 RPM's. At 70 it is 2200-2300. 3.93 gearing.

(in reply to Last Of The R/Ts)
Post #: 24
RE: durango r/t - 3/3/2005 1:41:16 AM   
71GTX

 

Posts: 70
Joined: 1/3/2004
From: United States
Status: offline
I would say the small difference you all are seeing might be the tires. They might not have the same tire height. This could account for higher, lower RPM's on the highway, and milage. I have a 00 R/T with a new tranny, headers and knock off KN unit. It only gets 13-14.5 no matter how I drive it. It got 13 towing my Roadrunner from TN a few weeks ago. It has a little lower profile tires, so it takes off fast and reads higher RPM's on the highway. I personally love the AWD vs the reg Durango. Have had both, and the R/T's are way better with weather conditions. A better G rating also side to side. Peace

(in reply to Kensai)
Post #: 25
RE: durango r/t - 3/7/2005 4:43:04 PM   
Kensai


Posts: 1652
Joined: 12/30/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
If it is the tire height, I do not think it would change the relationship between the RPM's and the speed reading on the speedo and rpm gauges as they are geared or calibrated on the computer side. So lets say you change the tires, if you do 70 mph according to your speedo, your speed will either be slower or faster than what the speedo says based on the height of the new tire. Taller than OEM tires will result faster mph than what the speedometer says, shorter height than OEM tires will result slower than what speedometer says. If speedo is calibrated to OEM tires and you bought oem replacment tires, your speedo should be on the money on actual speed on speedo.

(in reply to 71GTX)
Post #: 26
RE: durango r/t - 3/8/2005 9:43:24 AM   
cardfan


Posts: 41
Joined: 10/12/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rick980

I have a 2003 R/T 250 HP 345 Torque.....living in Canada, purchased it here also. No mention of using premium grade fuel, runs great other than mileage, no ping or knock.


Here is what my owners manual says... (been meaning to scan this since this topic came up). My friend has the Dakota R/T and told me that his too says that he only has to use 87 octane but after having him bring his book in, he did not read the entire page... His says the exact same thing as mine does... When he saw this picture and the little "87 Octane" emblem he just stopped reading, assuming that it was fine... Dodge is lazy, they only make one maual for all model each year...



Note the "exect for R/T model" reference...



And the manual cover...


(in reply to Rick980)
Post #: 27
RE: durango r/t - 3/8/2005 9:49:45 AM   
Kensai


Posts: 1652
Joined: 12/30/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
Just think, I wonder how your R/T durangos would perform if you were actually using premium fuel that these R/T's were designed for?

(in reply to cardfan)
Post #: 28
RE: durango r/t - 3/10/2005 11:39:26 PM   
Last Of The R/Ts


Posts: 1074
Joined: 11/13/2004
Status: offline
Just out of curiosity I peeked at my manual today and it says the exact opposite of what is posted above. It informs me that the use of Premium fuel is NOT recommended and can result in poor engine performance. I can post pics if someone really wants to see it. I was just too lazy to grab my camera.....

_____________________________


2003 Dodge Durango R/T

(in reply to Kensai)
Post #: 29
RE: durango r/t - 3/15/2005 2:47:54 AM   
Rick980

 

Posts: 54
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
Exactly what mine says.............may harm engine. I am not going to scan it. Mine is a 2003 and that is what the manual says. Makes no exceptions for R/T. I remember something about my 2000 Durango I had with the 4.7 l mentioning that if you used premium too often that you may have to continue to use it or you will experience spark knock or something to that effect..........like an addiction. I believe myself that any vehicle would probably perform better with some more octane but I am happy with how my D goes and well the price difference and the price alone for gas right now, I don't want to start something that I have to keep up....

< Message edited by Rick980 -- 3/15/2005 2:55:10 AM >

(in reply to Last Of The R/Ts)
Post #: 30
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>

 
 
Dodge Forums >> Dodge SUVs >> Dodge Durango >> 1st Gen Durango
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21040
badstratrt20755
midnight17500
vipergts14475
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912435
steve05ram3611346
nickoman0110864
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.