Dodge Dodge Forum
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

RE: Running truck with added water power

  Printable Version
Dodge >> Dodge Trucks >> Dodge Dakota >> 2nd Gen Dakota >> RE: Running truck with added water power Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Running truck with added water power - 4/25/2008 10:35:11 AM   
JasonA


Posts: 348
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
JasonA's photo gallery
Edit.  Format messed up.  Please disregard.

< Message edited by JasonA -- 4/25/2008 10:43:15 AM >


_____________________________

1997 Dodge Dakota Sport Club Cab
5.2L V-8 / 44RE / Emerald Green Pearl
255/70R15 Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s
Flowmaster 40-series Dual Exhaust
Pioneer DEH-2900/Sirius Stratus Receiver

(in reply to rpowell)
Post #: 46
RE: Running truck with added water power - 4/25/2008 10:38:30 AM   
rpowell

 

Posts: 101
Joined: 1/25/2008
Status: offline
What 'system' are you talking about (i.e. software)? I can click that link on several pc's and never get anything like that and I have a firewall and active I-net virus protection.

(in reply to JasonA)
Post #: 47
RE: Running truck with added water power - 4/25/2008 10:46:17 AM   
JasonA


Posts: 348
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
JasonA's photo gallery
The ISP (dunno who it is, I am at work).  The format of the screen copy/paste got messed up and looked jumbled so I just deleted it.

Someone must have submitted that ISP as "Dubious/Unsavory" -- that was the category it was filed under (as you originally saw).

_____________________________

1997 Dodge Dakota Sport Club Cab
5.2L V-8 / 44RE / Emerald Green Pearl
255/70R15 Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s
Flowmaster 40-series Dual Exhaust
Pioneer DEH-2900/Sirius Stratus Receiver

(in reply to rpowell)
Post #: 48
RE: Running truck with added water power - 4/25/2008 10:48:33 AM   
JasonA


Posts: 348
Joined: 3/24/2008
Status: offline
JasonA's photo gallery
I hope you're not buying anything from whomever sent you that scathing response about their competitor.  That was 100% unprofessional of them to ridicule a fellow competitor like that.  If that's how they handle their operations, I don't think I'd give them a penny.

_____________________________

1997 Dodge Dakota Sport Club Cab
5.2L V-8 / 44RE / Emerald Green Pearl
255/70R15 Firestone Firehawk Indy 500s
Flowmaster 40-series Dual Exhaust
Pioneer DEH-2900/Sirius Stratus Receiver

(in reply to JasonA)
Post #: 49
RE: Running truck with added water power - 4/25/2008 11:00:52 AM   
rpowell

 

Posts: 101
Joined: 1/25/2008
Status: offline
That was not a company that sells any particular product or brand. That web-site is made up of info that hundreds of people (some professional some not so) submit their findings and then they are posted by what the majority of the findings are. Everything stated in that response is true even if you don't agree with how he said it. Don't take this person's opinion or tone personal, sometimes you have to just take the useful info and throw the rest out, we are all human after all.

The point was companies are giving false warnings in order to keep people from trying inexpensive means of reaching the same goal. Why would they list things on their web-site as factual when their not, answer: so you will buy their product. Keep in mind I am very neutral in all this, as I stated I am going to buy some products from Protium, I just don't like it when companies say something that is not true. I mean stating that baking soda will "kill" you is a pretty bold statement.

I will let you know my findings after I try this stuff. If it works I will be very happy, if not at least I didn't spend $1000 trying.

(in reply to JasonA)
Post #: 50
RE: Running truck with added water power - 5/12/2008 2:22:59 PM   
TOOSTUBBORN2FAIL

 

Posts: 142
Joined: 2/20/2008
Status: offline
This is a response posted by Djseth in the neon forum, my dad, an electrical engineer with a masters and doctorate in physics agrees

Hey guys, its a scam.  I am a mechanical engineer, and I get paid to try and develop things like this.  If it worked, do you think they would be selling plans for a few bucks? Usually my company will spend around 100K trying to devlop something like this.

If you study physics and thermodydamics, you can see that this doesn't really do much.  As you try and use electrolysis to seperate water (with some sort of salt additive, because pure water doesn't support electrical flux you must use a solution), you make an exponentially higher resistive circut for the alternator or battey to combat.  As you do this, the stress of the engine increases.  This in turn, will cause a reduction is performance and fuel economy.  Furthermore, the stoichiometry doesn't support the claims they make.  The volume of water doesn't make that much H-OH (hydorgen hydroxide) to burn.  V=IR so if you increase the resistance, the current must drop to sustain the same voltage.  This means that you could potientially put a serious drain on your electrial system.

Simply put the basic laws of thermodynamics apply. You can't get more energy out of a system then you put into it.  This being the case, to seperate water, combust it, and have the main byproduct be water, doesn't put you at a higher energy level than when the system started.  You are not introducing more energy in the form of work into or out of the system.  All things being equal, you must account for added system losses.

Sorry, it just won't work.  If you buy it, more power to you.  Please reply with any findings that you come up with. 

_____________________________

1996 SOHC 2 DOOR BASE
PACESETTER HEADER/GLASSPACK
UNORTHODOX RACING ALTERNATOR ONLY PULLEY
FIDANZA ALUMINUM FLYWHEEL AND 4 PUCK KEVLAR CLUTCH
MOPAR STIFF MOTOR MOUNTS AND PROTHANE RACE INSERTS
VITORS POLY BUSHING BOBBLE STRUT
QUAIFE LSD

(in reply to JasonA)
Post #: 51
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]

 
 
Dodge Forum >> Dodge Trucks >> Dodge Dakota >> 2nd Gen Dakota
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21005
badstratrt20740
midnight17429
vipergts14468
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912434
steve05ram3611328
nickoman0110863
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.