Dodge Dodge Forum Ram SRT-10
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

Unhappy

  Printable Version
Dodge Forums >> Dodge Trucks >> Dodge Dakota >> Unhappy Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Unhappy - 1/29/2004 11:23:19 PM   
nojeffgordon

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 1/29/2004
From: United States
Status: offline

I have a fleet of different type units and I desided to buy a dakota. Seemed like a good value and nice mid size truck. 
Well,  I just took delivery of a 2004 4x4 quad cab with the revised v6. I hate to say this: It is a pig.  It has no power. (It wont pull a wet noodle out of a chickens butt).  It struggles just to cruize at 55/60 mph.
Does anyone out there have them same feeling? If so, other than take the truck back, any suggestions?

Post #: 1
Unhappy - 1/29/2004 11:37:34 PM   
Dodgegirl19




Toys For Tots Fund Contributor
Posts: 13072
Joined: 9/30/2003
From: Shelby Twp, Michigan
Status: offline
Dodgegirl19's photo gallery
Well... I'd blame the smaller engine, why not get the v8? It's a 4x4...

I LOVE your screen name!! :)

~Amanda

(in reply to nojeffgordon)
Post #: 2
Unhappy - 1/29/2004 11:51:54 PM   
nojeffgordon

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 1/29/2004
From: United States
Status: offline

Thanks for you reply and LOVING my nick name.
Employees tend to run the heck out of stuff that has a v/8. (burn outs, etc..)
I have 2 2001's with the older V6, not too happy with them either.  This year, we got 2004 at 2003 prices on our bids. I drove a 2 wd and thought I would give it a try. Well, 3rd time was not the charm.  I don't care if the dealers give us 2005 trucks for 2001 prices, I have learned the old lesson.  You get what you paid for.!!


(in reply to nojeffgordon)
Post #: 3
Unhappy - 1/29/2004 11:55:28 PM   
Dodgegirl19




Toys For Tots Fund Contributor
Posts: 13072
Joined: 9/30/2003
From: Shelby Twp, Michigan
Status: offline
Dodgegirl19's photo gallery
Hmmmm... that's frustrating...

So you won't have a v8?

~Amanda

(in reply to nojeffgordon)
Post #: 4
Unhappy - 1/30/2004 12:04:31 AM   
nojeffgordon

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 1/29/2004
From: United States
Status: offline

Unless you can swing a deal to let me trade this one for one with a v8  at no additional cost? LOL You think that a v6 would give you a lttle more low end.
Most people will give up a little MPG or HP, but its bad when you can't get either!!


(in reply to nojeffgordon)
Post #: 5
Unhappy - 1/30/2004 3:38:03 PM   
JimRoss

 

Posts: 42
Joined: 12/30/2003
From: United States
Status: offline

My 03 CC SXT 4x2 is horrible on low end, but mid to top isnt bad. I'm learning it is NOT a V8! I think we expect too much of these little V6's. Mine is 175hp, and I'm effectivly towing a 3000# camper with it.


16city and 21 hwy, cant complain for a 4000# truck.


Ummm, you complain you dont want your employee's doing burn-outs, then complain because they cant?


Also...maybe I dont want to know...but how do you know how hard it is to pull a wet noodle out of a chickens butt??


(in reply to nojeffgordon)
Post #: 6
RE: Unhappy - 2/7/2004 1:36:14 AM   
b0bcatt34

 

Posts: 9
Joined: 2/7/2004
From: San Diego, CA
Status: offline
I have an 02 Regular Cab SXT with the 3.9 V-6 Magnum and it's a pretty strong engine. I have the regular cab 2WD, so maybe the weight difference is enough to make your trucks feel sluggish. Maybe a few upgrades are in order? Intake? Exhaust? Ignition? EFI control chip? I'd be more than happy to test some stuff out for you on my truck. Just send products to...

... Josh

(in reply to JimRoss)
Post #: 7
RE: Unhappy - 2/7/2004 7:28:31 PM   
RcBandit28


Posts: 525
Joined: 1/25/2004
From: United States
Status: offline
That's odd...I work at Dodge Dealer...and people generally praise the 3.7L in the 4x4 Dakotas....say that it's a worlds better than the 3.9L.

_____________________________


2003 Ram 1500 Off-Road 4x4 HEMI
Regular Cab, Short Bed, Graphite, 3.92s
50,000 Gas Sucking Miles!

(in reply to b0bcatt34)
Post #: 8
RE: Unhappy - 2/9/2004 2:44:43 AM   
vHiEpMeIr


Posts: 1555
Joined: 12/7/2003
From: Manhattan, Kansas, United States
Status: offline
They do have little computers you can buy that will raise the horsepower from no addition to and addition of 60 horses. You should get one of those and maybe an intake. If that isn't enough you could get headers and exhaust. That would put you around the output of the 4.7 and possibly above it. If you don't mind spending some money, buy a supercharger or turbocharger for it. I agree with you though, don't trade it in. Hell they got 735HP/1300TQ out of a 6-cylinder in the Banks Sidewinder Dakota!

< Message edited by vHiEpMeIr -- 2/9/2004 1:44:57 AM >


_____________________________

"Rumpelstiltskin, b!tch!" - Something I screamed while my roomate and his girlfriend were trying to sleep.

(in reply to RcBandit28)
Post #: 9
RE: Unhappy - 3/5/2004 6:23:58 PM   
pstlpez

 

Posts: 1
Joined: 3/5/2004
Status: offline
Well, I'm not so sure about those 4.7's either. I bought an 03' with 18k on it and within 3500 miles the whole top end let go. Took the dealer over a month to fix it. They told me that there is a problem with the head gaskets and that's why they let go. Ended up having both heads replaced, and both exhaust manifolds because they were warped as well as the intake manifold because it would no longer seat properly. I haven't even had the chance to open the thing up yet. And man does that motor idle rough.

(in reply to nojeffgordon)
Post #: 10
RE: Unhappy - 3/5/2004 8:40:54 PM   
moparturd

 

Posts: 10141
Joined: 1/27/2004
Status: offline
4.7L with head gasket problems???? WOW, that's a new one. I put 40K on the dakota QC I had, and it was a solid engine. You maybe had a freak. I don't think anyone ever claimed the 3.7L was a power monster. It will also be interesting to see how they fair service wise in your fleet. The Dakota QC has to weigh 4400#, that's quite a bit of heft for the little six. Good luck.

(in reply to pstlpez)
Post #: 11
RE: Unhappy - 3/5/2004 11:30:46 PM   
Vader


Posts: 4465
Joined: 12/29/2003
Status: offline
NoJeffGordon, sorry to hear about your woes with the Truck. It sucks cuz youre committed to it now. Wish I had some better news. V6 pulling 4000lbs is not a good power to weight ratio.

_____________________________


(in reply to moparturd)
Post #: 12
RE: Unhappy - 3/8/2004 7:41:56 PM   
40intrepid

 

Posts: 132
Joined: 2/2/2004
From: United States
Status: offline
Give it time to break in, see how it feels with a few thousand miles on it.
But it sounds like you need a V-8.

(in reply to nojeffgordon)
Post #: 13
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
 
Dodge Forums >> Dodge Trucks >> Dodge Dakota
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21161
badstratrt20848
midnight17869
vipergts14501
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912450
steve05ram3611410
nickoman0110864
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.