Dodge Dodge Forum
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnership"

  Printable Version
Dodge >> General >> Brand News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion >> RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnership" Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/17/2008 4:51:44 PM   
ericemery


Posts: 3458
Joined: 1/30/2007
From: Michigan
Status: offline
ericemery's photo gallery
haha,  it must work...  chevy does it.  The Aveo is a Daewoo car.  (seriously.  look under the hood it says Daewoo on the sticker)


_____________________________


2006 SLT 4X4 Quad cab V8.
My Cardomain Page

(in reply to 03neonRT)
Post #: 16
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/17/2008 7:04:00 PM   
Midnight



Katrina Fund Contributor
Posts: 16850
Joined: 12/10/2004
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Status: online
Midnight's photo gallery
You know this because of your Aveo?

_____________________________

Dodge News: http://www.dodgeforum.com/forumid_42/tt.htm


http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3051794

(in reply to ericemery)
Post #: 17
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/18/2008 7:14:06 AM   
mb18


Posts: 1045
Joined: 5/17/2006
From: Lebanon, PA
Status: offline
mb18's photo gallery
I admit they're little throwaway death traps, but awfully successful ones...especially with gas prices hitting $3.50 this week...no matter who has a small car...Kia, Chevy, Toyota, Saturn, Honda...they're all going to sell like crazy. 

_____________________________


(in reply to Midnight)
Post #: 18
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/18/2008 3:15:51 PM   
ericemery


Posts: 3458
Joined: 1/30/2007
From: Michigan
Status: offline
ericemery's photo gallery
Nope,  my Cousin works at Williams Chevy in Traverse city Michigan.  (close to my location)

I have test drove a lot of the newer chevy car models, and that little car is freaky small.


but yes, it does have Daewoo all over it.   I will try to find a pic online.


EDIT**

its not a pic,  but it proves my point.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/reviews/healey/2004-05-20-aveo_x.htm


< Message edited by ericemery -- 4/18/2008 3:26:16 PM >


_____________________________


2006 SLT 4X4 Quad cab V8.
My Cardomain Page

(in reply to mb18)
Post #: 19
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/19/2008 7:32:16 AM   
Jr. Mechanic


Posts: 4012
Joined: 1/10/2007
From: Lima, Ohio
Status: offline
Jr. Mechanic's photo gallery
This is gonna suck, a hemi nissan? 

_____________________________

~Garret





quote:

By batman13
Convicted cokeheads are allowed to drive more than me.






(in reply to ericemery)
Post #: 20
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/19/2008 7:51:17 AM   
03neonRT


Posts: 6019
Joined: 11/10/2005
From: Toledo, Ohio
Status: offline
03neonRT's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jr. Mechanic

This is gonna suck, a hemi nissan? 


IMO, Chrysler would never let a HEMI go into another brands vehicle, even if they were product sharing...they'll probably use the 4.7 V8 though...

Besides, Nissans 5.6L VK56DE V8 used in the Titan is a pretty descent engine from what I hear...


_____________________________

- 2003 R/T: COMP 400 Cam, MSD Wires, K&N CAI, Eibach Prokit, Tokico Blues, Hotchkis Tuning Sway Bars, Vibrant F/R Strut Bars, Unorthodox UDP, Maddog 72% STS, JonnyMopar Solid Shifter/Booger Bushings, Prothane MM's, Exel Speeds, Toyo PX4's, RB1 GPS System

(in reply to Jr. Mechanic)
Post #: 21
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/19/2008 1:14:20 PM   
Midnight



Katrina Fund Contributor
Posts: 16850
Joined: 12/10/2004
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Status: online
Midnight's photo gallery
Yeah, the truck itself just sucks.

_____________________________

Dodge News: http://www.dodgeforum.com/forumid_42/tt.htm


http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3051794

(in reply to 03neonRT)
Post #: 22
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/20/2008 12:14:26 AM   
nascarnut


Posts: 186
Joined: 10/21/2005
Status: offline
As a former Dodge owner and current nissan owner, I'd say this doesn't scare me too much. Yes it's alittle disappointing that this is all happening but it comes with the times. I liked my 96 dodge because it had power and looks. When I was truck shopping, the Nissan was so much quieter and rattled less than the new Dodges. Plus, packaging the same, the Nissan was a good 8k less. Nissan does interiors and their drivetrain well. The same can't be said for the body and such. I hope that this partnership helps both companies where they need to improve, Nissan on truck durability and Dodge on interior quality.

(in reply to Midnight)
Post #: 23
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/20/2008 1:21:52 AM   
Altair


Posts: 4182
Joined: 3/10/2007
Status: offline
Altair's photo gallery
From reading auto reviews a lot I get the impression that Nissan makes some pretty fun to drive small cars which is one of the things Dodge needs right now (biggest mistake they made was killing the Neon).  I definitely agree it would be stupid on Chrysler's part to give Nissan the Hemi as an engine option though.  Hemi is a Mopar tradition and it should stay that way.

_____________________________


Dakota status = under repair

(in reply to nascarnut)
Post #: 24
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/20/2008 10:08:13 AM   
Midnight



Katrina Fund Contributor
Posts: 16850
Joined: 12/10/2004
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Status: online
Midnight's photo gallery
Well it better not be based off of the Sentra, because that car blows.

_____________________________

Dodge News: http://www.dodgeforum.com/forumid_42/tt.htm


http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3051794

(in reply to Altair)
Post #: 25
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 4/28/2008 7:43:43 PM   
97 3.5 Intrepid

 

Posts: 1397
Joined: 9/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Midnight

Funny you guys think small Nissan cars are good. I got news for you, I rented a Sentra for a while between the Neon and Stratus and that car was CRAP.

Agreed, and on top of that, even if the car was good, the issue is these arrangements more often than not turn out bad for Chrysler.   Here Chrysler is about to trade one of their bread and butter products in for a third rate car.  For years Chrysler had rebadged many Mitsubishi products that were actually good and they didn't sell worth a darn and neither did the ones that weren't very good.  Why do they believe this time it will be different? 

On top of this, majority of the times that GM and Ford have done this it has resulted in the same failure.  There are only a handful of times that this was a success and no real example of an outstanding success.  The Big Three are the most successful when they do their own work. 

This also begs the question, why can't the company that once made the Neon be able to make the Neon's successor by themselves?  Why in their minds must they rely on manufacturers who often times make inferior products to theirs to build a new car? 

What Chrysler needs to do is pick up the blue prints of the Neon and look at the aspects of the Neon that made it a successful car and implement them on a new car.

The thing that also bothers me about a relationship like this is they might use a Nissan powertrain.  Now there are some engines that Nissan has that I like such as the VQ -series V6; however, their I4s have a reputation for having reliability issues.  Then it makes me worry that they will be even more likely to use those awful CVTs.  No matter what they get, they should use their own I4s (excuse me their joint venture I4s) over anything Nissan offers them and use their own transmissions.

_____________________________

College Graduate
B.S. in Marketing

(in reply to Midnight)
Post #: 26
RE: BREAKING: Chrysler and Nissan form "Partnershi... - 5/2/2008 1:54:56 PM   
crh47

 

Posts: 6
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
I think Chysler got the better half of the deal. I don't think Nissan is going to be serious about thier trucks in the future, but they want to make sure they have an option for the Nissan enthusiasts that won't buy anything else. If trucks end up becoming a niche market with the new cafe, this could prove to be a smart move. If they remain popular, they're in trouble. Those that want a Ram will buy a Ram, and the Titan will go the way of the Raider...nowhere. However, Chysler could use all the help they can get in the small car arena, so this is a good move for them.

And, by the way, everyone realizes that Hyundai owns Kia, right, so one can't be crap and the other improving when they are built side by side.

(in reply to 03neonRT)
Post #: 27
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]

 
 
Dodge Forum >> General >> Brand News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Car of the Month
May 2008
2003 Neon SRT-4

Ride of the Month
May 2008
2005 3500 QCLB Laramie Sport 5.9L CTD Auto

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins20389
badstratrt20284
midnight16850
vipergts14303
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912398
steve05ram3611138
nickoman0110860
drew9991
casper9604

New Vendors
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Access Roll-Up Cover
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
Royal Purple
DodgeChallenger.com

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.