Dodge Dodge Forum
Dodge Forum Dodge Ram
Dodge Forum   Dodge Classifieds   News   Photo Gallery   Calendar   Search   Contact   Sponsors
Dodge Recalls & TSBs   Dodge Lineup   Dodge Wallpaper   Dodge History   Dodge Timeslips   Member List   Register   Login

analysis of flaws in European Union fuel econ test

  Printable Version
Dodge >> General >> Brand News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion >> Off Brand News, Concepts & Rumors >> analysis of flaws in European Union fuel econ test Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
analysis of flaws in European Union fuel econ test - 10/11/2007 3:57:19 AM   
HankL

 

Posts: 2719
Joined: 8/20/2005
Status: offline
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/main.jhtml?xml=/motoring/2007/10/06/nosplit/mffuel06.xml

sample quote:

"The same car can double or halve its consumption depending on how and where it is driven," says de Nayer. But the devil lies in the detail. In small cars, cold starts and high-speed driving have a catastrophic effect on fuel consumption. Automatics are more frugal on motorways than when driven gently on country lanes, yet manuals are the opposite. A hatchback is more economical than its MPV or SUV equivalent. There's plenty of lore in fuel consumption testing.  Ford's Tim Howard is aware of the problems, and explains the factors behind the variable gap between EU figures and real life. Petrol engines are not efficient on light loads, suffering pumping losses, internal friction and air resistance past the throttle butterflies in the inlet ports. At high engine speeds not covered in the EU tests, many engines (especially turbocharged ones) use over-rich air/fuel mixtures to cool the pistons and valves. Engines differ in these respects, affecting their real-world consumption.  Many car makers will also use a higher gear ratio to improve their test-cycle CO2 emissions. But, as Howard says, "there are plenty of studies to show that improvement doesn't always happen in real life, especially in urban driving". There is also the massive influence of temperature. Howard reckons that there is a difference of seven to 10 per cent between the CO2 emissions of a fully warmed-up car and one running at the 20C required by the EU test. What's more, some warm up faster than others. "Vehicles vary enormously on these sorts of things," he says.
Post #: 1
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
 
Dodge Forum >> General >> Brand News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion >> Off Brand News, Concepts & Rumors
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
new used
Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
dustyloins21161
badstratrt20848
midnight17869
vipergts14501
dodgegirl1913072
ramfan5.912450
steve05ram3611410
nickoman0110864
drew10116
casper9606

New Vendors
Truxedo
Airaid
Mopar Biz
ATI ProCharger
Motor City Auto Parts
Sonic Electronix
Buy Auto Truck Accessories
Buy Car Floor Mats
Edge Products
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Harley Davidson | Ford Mustang Forums | Dodge Challenger

Dodge Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Daimler Chrysler.